Max Tension Force for Box Not to Slip: 24.5N

  • Thread starter Thread starter zellster87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum tension force in a scenario where a rope pulls a sled with a box on it across frictionless snow. The coefficient of static friction for wood on wood is given as 0.5, leading to a calculated maximum static friction force of 24.5N for the 5kg box. However, it is emphasized that this value only represents the force the sled can exert on the box without slipping, not the total tension needed. To find the maximum tension, one must also consider the acceleration of both the box and the sled together. Thus, the final answer requires accounting for the combined mass and the resulting acceleration to determine the true maximum tension force.
zellster87
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A horizontal rope pulls a 10kg wood sled across frictionless snow. A 5.0kg wood box rides on the sled. The coefficient of static friction for wood on wood is mu = 0.5.

What is the largest tension force for which the box doesn't slip?

Homework Equations



f(static) = mu * f(normal)


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't really see how the mass of the sled is relevant. But here's what I did:

f(static) = 0.5 * 5(9.81) = 24.5N
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've calculated the maximum horizontal force the sled can exert on the 5 Kg box. That is not the whole answer to the question though.

In order to exert that force and accelerate the box, the sled itself must also be accelerating, and therefore you must calculate the acceleration that the 5 Kg box would undergo with a force of 24.5 N acting on it. The max tension in the rope would be the force required to accelerate the box AND the sled.
 
ah ok. Thanks for the reply.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top