Max Theta for Block and Rod System

  • Thread starter Thread starter chickendude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the maximum angle theta for a block and rod system using different methods. The first method, based on conservation of energy, fails due to the inelastic nature of the collision between the block and the rod. The second method attempts to apply torque and angular momentum but confuses the integration of torque with work, leading to incorrect results. Participants clarify that the correct approach involves determining the speed and energy of the system immediately after the collision, followed by calculating how high it rises. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying conservation principles in inelastic collisions.
chickendude
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


11-56.gif


Find the maximum theta given that
h (initial height of block)
m (mass of block)
M (mass of rod)
L (length of rod)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I did it three different ways and none of them worked. What is wrong with these ideas?

Method 1: Potential Energy

The gravitational potential energy of the block and rod's center of mass must be equal before and after since initially and finally, the system has no kinetic energy

U_{blocki} + U_{rodi} = U_{blockf} + U_{rodf}

mgh + Mg\frac{L}{2} = mg(L-L\cos\theta) + Mg(L-\frac{L}{2}\cos\theta)

mh + \frac{ML}{2} = mL(1-\cos\theta) + \frac{ML}{2}(1+1-\cos\theta)

mh + \frac{ML}{2} = mL(1-\cos\theta) + \frac{ML}{2} + \frac{ML}{2}(1-\cos\theta)

mh = (mL + \frac{ML}{2})(1-\cos\theta)

\cos\theta = 1 - \frac{mh}{mL + \frac{ML}{2}}



Method 2: Torque

The velocity of the block at the bottom of the ramp is
v = \sqrt{2gh}

The angular momentum of the system is the angular momentum of the block just before it hits (since the rod is at rest)

l = I\omega = (mL^2)(\frac{v}{L})

l = mL\sqrt{2gh}

Gravity provides torque which changes the angular momentum from that quantity down to zero, so

I found the torque of the block and the rod separately and added them together
\tau_{block} = r \times F = L(mg)\sin\theta

\tau_{rod} = r \times F = \frac{L}{2}(Mg)\sin\theta

mL\sqrt{2gh} = \int_0^{\theta_{max}} \tau d\theta

mL\sqrt{2gh} = \int_0^{\theta_{max}} (Lmg+\frac{LMg}{2})\sin\theta d\theta

m\sqrt{2gh} = (mg + \frac{Mg}{2})(1-\cos\theta_{max})

\cos\theta_{max} = 1 - \frac{m\sqrt{2gh}}{mg + \frac{Mg}{2}}


Why aren't they the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check your solutions in detail, but your Method 1 assumes conservation of energy. But that collision of block with rod looks like an inelastic collision to me.
 
Ah yes, that makes complete sense
Now I understand why the energy conservation method didn't work through the inelastic collision.

The second method uses torque and conservation of angular momentum. It should work in an inelastic collision yet it doesn't :(
 
chickendude said:
The second method uses torque and conservation of angular momentum. It should work in an inelastic collision yet it doesn't :(
It's not clear to me what you're doing by integrating torque with respect to theta. That gives the work done, not the change in angular momentum! If you do this right, it will work. (You're mixing this up with angular impulse, which is torque*time, not torque*theta.)

But it's much easier than all that. First find the speed and thus energy of the block+rod system immediately after the collision. (What's conserved during the collision?) Then figure out how high it rises. (What's conserved after the collision?)
 
ah, yes, I just got it through that method.Yeah, I confused angular impulse with work.
When we were doing linear momentum and impulse, I would make that mistake as well (integrate with respect to x rather than t), but now I see the problem.

Thanks a lot!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top