Maximizing Area with a 10m Wire: Square or Equilateral Triangle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greywolfe1982
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Maximum Wire
Greywolfe1982
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How do you cut a 10m piece of wire to get the maximum area when forming a square and an equilateral triangle?

Homework Equations



asquare=s2
atriangle=s2*\sqrt{}3/4

The Attempt at a Solution



(Note that I've already found the total area function, its derivative, its critical points and that x=~8.73 is a minimum.) As far as I know, the maximum area comes from not cutting the wire at all and making a triangle. Using those area formulas, it gives an area of ~43.3m2. However, the back of the book says maximum area comes from making a square. But doesn't this only give an area of 6.25m2? (s=10/4m, s2=6.25m2) Is the book wrong, or am I overlooking something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your formulae were correct, but you must've plugged the wrong value of s in when calculating the area of the triangle. Since it's an equilateral triangle, s=10/3 and plugging this into the triangle area formula A=\frac{s\sqrt{3}}{4} gives A\approx 4.8 which is less than the area of the square.

You might find this interesting to note, if you consider a circle as being a regular polygon with infinite sides, then for any given perimeter P, the more sides the polygon has, the larger its area. For example, an equilateral triangle with perimeter P (each side P/3) has less area than a square with sides P/4 each, which is less than a pentagon... etc. and the circle with perimeter P has the largest possible area.
 
Aww. You beat me to it.

I was in the shower when I realized I used 10 as a side instead of 10/3. I haven't worked it out yet, but I'm assuming I won't have any problems from here. Thanks for the response.
 
Ahh that shower... we'd still be counting with our fingers if it weren't for that invention :wink:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top