Maximizing Engine Power: The Benefits of Using a Trailer for Moving Heavy Loads

  • Thread starter Thread starter jdrinker99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trailer
AI Thread Summary
When comparing a 2000-pound vehicle to a 1000-pound vehicle with a 1000-pound trailer, the 2000-pound vehicle requires less engine power to move due to its design efficiency for heavier loads. Adding a trailer increases mass, wind resistance, and friction, thereby increasing the work required from the engine. Specifically, pulling a 1000-pound trailer adds 1200 pounds of work compared to just adding a 200-pound load directly to the vehicle. Vehicles with more axles, like a four-axle system, can reduce force per tire contact patch, potentially lowering rubber hysteresis, but may not significantly impact overall rolling resistance. Ultimately, a heavier vehicle is generally more efficient for towing than a lighter vehicle with a trailer.
jdrinker99
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If I have the following 2 vehicles:

Vehicle 1: Weighs 2000 pounds
Vehicle 2: Weighs 1000 pounds with a 1000 pound trailer

Which requires more engine power to move? Does the weight distrubution on the additonal axles of the trailer decrease the required force needed to move the vehicle?

A free christmas tree is riding on this (no pun intended). Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Skip the tree.

If you just add a trailer to the vehicle it adds mass, wind resistance, axle resistance and friction to turn the wheels. No matter how small you can engineer those resistances to be, if you add mass to the weight the engine must pull, you added work.

So: If you have a 1000 lb trailer to pull a 200 lb tree, you added 1200lb of work to the engine. If you strap the tee to the the truck you added 200lb of work to the engine.

You do the math...lol
 
Last edited:
A 2000lb. vehicle will definitely be more efficient power-wise than a 1000lb. vehicle with a 1000lb. trailer for all sorts of practical reasons.

1000lb. vehicles are hard-pressed to pull double their weight, whereas a 2000lb. vehicle is designed to efficiently pull 2000lb.
 
I think the original post is more about the number of axles. Assume two vehicles with the same mass, one with 2 axles, and one with 4 axles. Which one has more rotational friction?

One advantage of a 4 axle system is less force per contact patch on each tire, which should reduce the overall amount of rubber hysteresis. I'm not sure what it does for the overall rolling resistance.

Since the doubled up axles are in-line, there shouldn't be much difference in aerodynamic drag.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top