Maximizing range and time aloft when throwing a ball

  • Thread starter Thread starter FredGirl13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Range Time
AI Thread Summary
To maximize the range and time aloft when throwing a ball at an upward angle, one should consider the optimal launch angle, which is typically around 45 degrees in a vacuum. The kinematic equations of motion can be applied to determine the ball's trajectory, factoring in gravity's constant acceleration. Including air resistance complicates the calculations, as it alters the ball's path and reduces both range and time aloft. Practical considerations, such as the thrower's technique and the ball's spin, can also significantly impact performance. Understanding these principles is essential for achieving the best results in projectile motion.
FredGirl13
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
If you were to throw a ball at an upward angle, what changes could you make to maximize the range and time aloft of the ball and how will these changes affect the balls path. I'm just wondering what would be the best way someone could throw something, but we'll just keep it simple with a normal run of the mill ball.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FredGirl13 said:
If you were to throw a ball at an upward angle, what changes could you make to maximize the range and time aloft of the ball and how will these changes affect the balls path. I'm just wondering what would be the best way someone could throw something, but we'll just keep it simple with a normal run of the mill ball.

Are you familiar with the kinematic equations of motion (for constant acceleration, like due to gravity)? Those are the basic equations you use, along with a little calculus, to show what the optimum path is. That also neglects effects due to are resistance -- things get mofe complicated when you include air resistance.
 
Do you want answer on basic projectile motions or on practical stuff.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top