Maximizing Temperature in Identical Blocks with Constant Heat Capacity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around maximizing the temperature of one block among three identical blocks with constant heat capacity, where two blocks are at temperature T1 and one at T2, with T1 greater than T2. The proposed solution indicates that the highest achievable temperature T can be calculated using a specific equation, but participants express skepticism about its validity. They explore the concept of heat flow between the blocks and suggest that achieving a higher temperature in one block may require the use of heat pumps and engines to transfer energy efficiently. Concerns are raised about the accuracy of the provided answer, particularly regarding its implications when T1 approaches T2. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of thermodynamic principles in this scenario.
TheTank
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hope to get a little help here..
3 identical blocks with constant heatcapasity have temperatures T1, T1, T2, with T1>T2.
What is the highest possible temperature T we can achive in one of the blocks, when no heat/work exchange with the envoriment.

Answere T=2T_{1}+\frac{1}{2}T_{2}-\sqrt{2T_1 T_2 +\frac{1}{4}{T_2}^2}



Homework Equations


TdS=dU, dU=dQ=cdT


The Attempt at a Solution



I end up with a 3. grade equation for T. Very sceptical..
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Anyone?
 


TheTank said:

Homework Statement



Hope to get a little help here..
3 identical blocks with constant heatcapasity have temperatures T1, T1, T2, with T1>T2.
What is the highest possible temperature T we can achive in one of the blocks, when no heat/work exchange with the envoriment.

Answere T=2T_{1}+\frac{1}{2}T_{2}-\sqrt{2T_1 T_2 +\frac{1}{4}{T_2}^2}


Homework Equations


TdS=dU, dU=dQ=cdT


The Attempt at a Solution



I end up with a 3. grade equation for T. Very sceptical..
I am not sure how one gets that answer.

Heat flow of \Delta Q will flow from 2M to M where \Delta Q = 2MC(T_f - T_1) = -MC(T_f - T_2).

So, it seems to me that the equilibrium temperature is:

T_f =(T_2 + 2T_1)/3


AM
 


The odd thing here is that one of the blocks will get a higher end temperature. Maybe if we imagine two Carnot engines working between the cold and the hot blocks? So that we can say that change in entropy S is zero. I can't get the "correct" answere either.

Hope for more response. Thanks
 


TheTank said:
The odd thing here is that one of the blocks will get a higher end temperature. Maybe if we imagine two Carnot engines working between the cold and the hot blocks? So that we can say that change in entropy S is zero. I can't get the "correct" answere either.
Ok. Let's call them A, B and C (A and B being at T1). In order to increase the temperature of A you have to move heat from B. To do that you have to run a heat pump between B and A. The work to run the heat pump comes from running a heat engine between B and C. If the heat pump and heat engines are as efficient as possible, you will maximize the amount of heat delivered to A.

But I don't think the given answer can be correct. The limit would be where T1 is arbitrarily close to T2 and it would be T1. That equation gives a higher limit.

AM
 


Thanks :) appreciated!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top