Maximum amplitude of oscillation of a block

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum amplitude of oscillation for a block system to prevent slipping, given a larger block of 26 kg and a smaller block of 9 kg with a static friction coefficient of 0.459. The necessary force to overcome static friction is calculated to be 40.52 Newtons, leading to an acceleration of 4.5 m/s² for the smaller block. The user seeks to determine the amplitude that would ensure the acceleration does not exceed this value. Although the homework is late, the user expresses a better understanding of the problem after engaging in the discussion. The focus is on applying physics principles to solve for safe oscillation limits in a frictional context.
Mac13
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I've been staring at this problem for a loonnng time and i just can't figure it out:(.. i would appreciate it if someone could help me...thx! :)

A large block with mass 26 kg executes
horizontal simple harmonic motion as it slides
across a frictionless surface with a frequency
1:9 Hz : Block smaller block with mass 9 kg
rests on it, and the
coefcient of static friction between the two is
u = 0.459.
The acceleration of gravity is 9:8.
What maximum amplitude of oscillation
can the system have if the block is not to slip?
Answer in units of cm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The weight of the smaller block is 9(9.81) = 88.29 Newtons. The force necessary to overcome the static friction, then is (88.29)(0.459)= 40.52 Newtons. Using "F= ma", that would correspond to an acceleration (of the smaller) block of 40.52= 9a or
a= 4.50 m/s2. What amplitude would give a maximum acceleration no greater than 4.5 m/s2?
 
thanks...its a little too late to turn it in for my homework because it was due early this morning but at least i understand it now:)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top