Maximum angle of inclined plane before falling off the plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the maximum angle of an inclined plane before an object falls off. It highlights the relationship between the angle, the coefficient of static friction, and the forces acting on the object. The key formula presented is tan(α) = μ, where α is the angle and μ is the coefficient of static friction, indicating the angle at which sliding begins. Additionally, the concept of toppling is introduced, emphasizing that if the center of mass extends beyond the base, the object will topple. The conversation aims to clarify the conditions under which an object will either slide or fall off the incline.
Sinnaro
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been thinking about this for a model I'm devising. Assuming that you have an object of mass m, height h, coefficient of friction u, how large can you make the angle between the ground and the inclined plane. Otherwise, at what angle does the torque from the center of mass of the object overcome the force that is keeping the object on the inclined plane?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

If the incline is completely flat and the coefficient of friction is for static friction, then you can find the largest angle for which the mass won't slide by noting that the maximum force along the slide is usually modeled simply as the normal force times the coefficient, and you can equate that with the force from gravity down the incline, that is,

\mu F_n = \mu mg \cos(\alpha) = F_g = mg \sin(\alpha) \ \Rightarrow \ \tan(\alpha) = \mu

where \alpha is the angle and \mu the coefficient of static friction.
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi Sinnaro! Welcome to PF! :wink:

I'm not sure whether you're talking about sliding (which as Filip Larsen :smile: says depends on whether the tangent exceeds the coefficient of static friction), or toppling.

If it's toppling, then all that matters is whether a vertical line through the centre of mass goes outside the base. :wink:
 
To clarify: it is assumed that the mass is sliding down the plane. I'm looking for the angle (as the angle approaches 90 degrees) for which the mass will no longer be in contact with the plane (falls off).

Picture of what I'm talking about. Assume that the mass looks similar to my drawing (tall vertical height with wide base):

http://i.imgur.com/kIwSt.png
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top