Maximum Compression for a Block on Spring

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a block compressing a spring, specifically analyzing the maximum compression of the spring using different methods, including Newton's laws and conservation of energy.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to solve the problem using Newton's laws but finds a discrepancy in their answer compared to the expected result. They express confusion about why their method yields half the correct answer.
  • Some participants explain that the equilibrium position does not account for the block's motion past that point, leading to further compression of the spring.
  • Others suggest that using conservation of energy is more appropriate for determining maximum compression, as it considers kinetic energy and potential energy changes.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different methods to approach the problem, with some providing insights into the limitations of using Newton's laws for this scenario. There is acknowledgment of the effectiveness of the conservation of energy approach, but no consensus has been reached on the best method.

Contextual Notes

The original poster's confusion stems from the application of Newton's laws at the equilibrium position, which does not account for the subsequent motion of the block. The discussion also highlights the importance of understanding energy conservation in this context.

Abu
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A spring of negligible mass has force constant k = 800 N/m. You place the spring vertically with one end on the floor. You then lay a 1.6 kg block on top of the spring and release the book from rest. Find the maximum distance the spring will be compressed
Relevant Equations
F = kx
Hi everyone, just a quick question..

I tried this problem using Newtons laws, not conservation of energy, and I got an answer exactly half of what the correct answer is, and I'm not sure why. Here is what I did:

Net force = zero once the spring is compressed, therefore

mg - kx = 0
mg = kx
mg/k = x
1.6(9.8)/800 = x
x = 1.96 cm

The actual answer is 3.92 cm however, and I don't know why.

If I do this problem using conservation of energy, I get the correct answer but I can't explain why my Newtons laws method is wrong.

Thanks for your consideration!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you let go of the block and it starts compressing the spring, the spring will start oscillating. The equation you were using is at the equilibrium position where gravity and elastic force cancel. However, once block reaches this position, it will have non-zero velocity, so it will move past this point and compress the spring further, until it's velocity drops to zero. At this point, elastic force will be bigger than gravity, so it will push the block up, hence it will oscillate.

Therefore, since the energy is conserved, in order to get the maximum compression, you need the equation where kinetic energy is zero, so by substituting correct potential energy for gravity and elastic force, you get the right answer, as you did. In order to get that same point via Newton's law, you'd need to search for the point where elastic force is maximal, not the point where it cancels with gravity. This would prove more complicated than using energy conservation in my opinion, so that's why this exercise is most likely intended to be done using energy conservation.

Hope that helps.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Abu
Antarres said:
When you let go of the block and it starts compressing the spring, the spring will start oscillating. The equation you were using is at the equilibrium position where gravity and elastic force cancel. However, once block reaches this position, it will have non-zero velocity, so it will move past this point and compress the spring further, until it's velocity drops to zero. At this point, elastic force will be bigger than gravity, so it will push the block up, hence it will oscillate.

Therefore, since the energy is conserved, in order to get the maximum compression, you need the equation where kinetic energy is zero, so by substituting correct potential energy for gravity and elastic force, you get the right answer, as you did. In order to get that same point via Newton's law, you'd need to search for the point where elastic force is maximal, not the point where it cancels with gravity. This would prove more complicated than using energy conservation in my opinion, so that's why this exercise is most likely intended to be done using energy conservation.

Hope that helps.
Thank you so much for your fast reply. Your response helped me a lot, I really appreciate it! Thanks!
 
You're welcome!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K