Maximum efficiency of an engine taking heat from two hot reservoirs

Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A heat engine is taking identical amounts of heat from two hot reservoirs at temperatures ##T_{H1}, T_{H2} ## doing work and then heat to a cold reservoir ##T_C ##

What is the maximum efficiency of this heat engine?

Homework Equations



For a Carnot cyle it is ## \eta = 1 - T_C/T_H##

The Attempt at a Solution



First of all, the heat engine takes ##Q_1## from ##T_{H1}## and ##Q_2## from ##T_{H2} ## it then does work ##W## and heats ##T_C ##

I thought that since the maximum efficiency was for a reversible process that does the same thing then I could make a new process that takes heat ##Q_1+Q_2## from a reservoir of temperature ## T_H = \frac{T_{H1}+T_{H2}}{2} ##

Making the efficiency (max) ## \eta = 1 - T_C/T_H = 1 - \frac{2 T_C}{T_{H1}+T_{H2}} ##

Am I able to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gregg said:

Homework Statement



A heat engine is taking identical amounts of heat from two hot reservoirs at temperatures ##T_{H1}, T_{H2} ## doing work and then heat to a cold reservoir ##T_C ##

What is the maximum efficiency of this heat engine?

Homework Equations



For a Carnot cyle it is ## \eta = 1 - T_C/T_H##

The Attempt at a Solution



First of all, the heat engine takes ##Q_1## from ##T_{H1}## and ##Q_2## from ##T_{H2} ## it then does work ##W## and heats ##T_C ##

I thought that since the maximum efficiency was for a reversible process that does the same thing then I could make a new process that takes heat ##Q_1+Q_2## from a reservoir of temperature ## T_H = \frac{T_{H1}+T_{H2}}{2} ##

Making the efficiency (max) ## \eta = 1 - T_C/T_H = 1 - \frac{2 T_C}{T_{H1}+T_{H2}} ##

Am I able to do this?

'Fraid not.

Write down the equation for the 1st and 2nd laws and solve for η = W/2Q.
 
Take it to be a reversible process

##\eta = |\frac{2Q-Q_C}{2Q}| ##

Now the problem is to relate that to the temperatures ##T_{H1}## and ##T_{H2} ##. Going to say that they are Carnot engines. I'm not sure this right but my attempt:

##\eta = 1 - \frac{Q_C}{2Q}##

For an ireversible process we have

## \oint \frac{\delta q}{T} = 0 ##

## \frac{Q}{T_{H1}} + \frac{Q}{T_{H2}} - \frac{Q_C}{T_C} = 0 ##

## \frac{Q(T_{H1}+T_{H2})}{{T_{H1}}{T_{H2}}} = \frac{Q_C}{T_C}##

## 2Q = \frac{2 T_{H1}T_{H_2}Q_C}{T_C(T_{H1}+T_{H2})} ##

##\eta = 1 - \frac{T_C(T_{H1}+T_{H2})}{2 T_{H1}T_{H_2}} ##
 
Gregg said:
Take it to be a reversible process

##\eta = |\frac{2Q-Q_C}{2Q}| ##

Now the problem is to relate that to the temperatures ##T_{H1}## and ##T_{H2} ##. Going to say that they are Carnot engines. I'm not sure this right but my attempt:

##\eta = 1 - \frac{Q_C}{2Q}##

For an ireversible process we have

## \oint \frac{\delta q}{T} = 0 ##

## \frac{Q}{T_{H1}} + \frac{Q}{T_{H2}} - \frac{Q_C}{T_C} = 0 ##

## \frac{Q(T_{H1}+T_{H2})}{{T_{H1}}{T_{H2}}} = \frac{Q_C}{T_C}##

## 2Q = \frac{2 T_{H1}T_{H_2}Q_C}{T_C(T_{H1}+T_{H2})} ##

##\eta = 1 - \frac{T_C(T_{H1}+T_{H2})}{2 T_{H1}T_{H_2}} ##

You get an A+! Good shot!

It's always best to go back to fundamentals instead of relying on formulas that may or may not apply. You did it the right way.

PS - you said "irreversible process". You meant "reversible".
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top