Maximum electric force felt by the raindrop

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum electric force experienced by a third charged raindrop (Q) positioned on the y-axis, influenced by two equally charged drops (q) on the x-axis. Using Coulomb's Law, the force equation is derived, indicating that the net force acts in the y direction due to symmetry. To maximize the force, the position of charge Q must be varied along the y-axis, as the distance affects the force inversely. The challenge lies in determining the optimal y value for maximum force, acknowledging that placing Q at the origin results in zero force. Ultimately, the problem requires mathematical optimization of the derived force expression.
veevee
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Suppose 2 drops with equal charge q are on the x-axis at x=+-a. Find the maximum electric force felt by a third drop with charge Q at an arbitrary point on the y axis.

from the symmetry we can deduce that the x components cancel and the net force is in the y direction. the y component is same for both charges.

I used Coulomb's Law to get the equation

F=2((kqQ)/a2+y2)(y/sqrt(a2+y2) j(hat)

=(2kqQy)/(a2+y2)3/2 j(hat)

I know that the next step is to find the y value for which the force is maximized, however I'm not too sure on how to do that. I thought maybe the y is max when the charges a are at the origin, but I don't think that the charges could be moved over to the origin for this calculation.

any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right. You can't move the charges on the x-axis; or mathematically speaking, a is a constant. What you can do is move the third charge, that is, vary y, to maximize |F(y)|.
 
hmm...

so since the length from the q charge to the Q charge is inversely proportional to the force felt by Q (1/y), the closer Q is to both q's, the more force it experiences. But if it was the lined up with them on the x axis, the net force would be 0. So, do I need to make it as close to the origin as possible? And would other equations, such as F=qE need to be incorporated to solve for y?

thanks for helping me
 
As close to the origin as possible would be at the origin, where, you have already noted, the force is 0. If Q is very far away, again the force is essentially 0. So the maxima occur somewhere in between.

You already have the expression for the force. Just find where it's attains a maximum. This is a math problem now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top