Maximum Height Calculation for Elastic Collision on Frictionless Track

  • Thread starter Thread starter ace214
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about calculating the maximum height after an elastic collision on a frictionless track, participants focused on the conservation of momentum and energy principles. The initial calculations for the velocity of the first block and the subsequent height were incorrect due to a misunderstanding of the momentum equation, which should account for both blocks moving post-collision. A correct approach involves using both conservation of momentum and kinetic energy equations to solve for the final velocities of the blocks. The relative velocity equation for elastic collisions was also suggested as a simpler method to find the solution. Ultimately, participants emphasized the importance of accurate calculations and proper application of physics principles to achieve the correct maximum height.
ace214
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Consider a frictionless track as shown in Figure P6.48. A block of mass m1 = 5.55 kg is released from A. It makes a head on elastic collision at B with a block of mass m2 = 11.0 kg that is initially at rest. Calculate the maximum height to which m1 rises after the collision.

p6-48.gif


I used to .5mv^2 = mgh to get the velocity of the first block at the bottom. That was 9.9 m/s.

Then I did m1vi + m2vi = m1vf + m2vf => m1vi + 0 = 0 + m2vf to solve for the speed of the second block when the first block has gone back up the ramp and stopped. I then used the energy in the first equation and conservation of energy to solve for the final height.

KE = m1gh + .5m2v2f

But this gave me a height of 4.49 meters which WebAssign says is not correct. Thanks for any help. By the way, it's due at 8:30 EST tomorrow morning.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're conservation of momentum equation is incorrect. Both blocks are moving after the collision, so m_1 v_1 = m_1 v_1 _f + m_2 v_2 _f

Since there are two unknowns, you need two equations. What else do you know to be true for elastic collisions?

I got to log off, but here's a hint: KINETIC ENERGY.

and there's a really simple way of doing this that doesn't involve squared speeds.
 
Last edited:
Chi Meson said:
You're conservation of momentum equation is incorrect. Both blocks are moving after the collision, so m_1 v_1 = m_1 v_1 _f + m_2 v_2 _f

Since there are two unknowns, you need two equations. What else do you know to be true for elastic collisions?

That energy is conserved. So I use that momentum equation and
KE = m1v1f^2 + 11v2f^2

Solve for v1f and I get 9.9 and -3.3. So I use -3.3 and plug that into a new KE = PE for the amount of energy that the first block has now. And now I'm getting within 10% of the answer so I rounded badly somewhere. Great... Thanks for the help.
 
ace214 said:
That energy is conserved. So I use that momentum equation and
KE = m1v1f^2 + 11v2f^2

Solve for v1f and I get 9.9 and -3.3. So I use -3.3 and plug that into a new KE = PE for the amount of energy that the first block has now. And now I'm getting within 10% of the answer so I rounded badly somewhere. Great... Thanks for the help.

Yeah, it's not 3.3, it's 3.25. You've got 3 sigs here.

And the easier way I mentioned in the edit to my last post is:

the relative velocity between 2 bodies in a 1-D elastic collision stays constant. So: v1 - v2 = v2' - v1'

try it, it saves lots of time.
 
Ah cool. Thanks a lot.

Yeah, I did a quadratic and it was a pain.

I need to look up that equation and stuff cus I don't see off the bat how masses don't matter but ok.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top