Maximum of a trigonometric function

NaturePaper
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
This is related to my previous https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=398964". I am having trouble to get the maximum of the following trigonometric function:

<br /> <br /> \cos^m\theta_1(c\cos^n\theta_2+s\sin^n\theta_2)+\sin^m\theta_1 ( c\sin^n\theta_2+s\cos^n\theta_2)<br /> <br />

Here m,n\ge2 \mbox{ are fixed positive integers and } c,s are fixed positive reals with c^2+s^2=1. The maximum is to be carried out w.r.t. \theta_1,\theta_2 in the range 0\le\theta_1,\theta_2\le\frac{\pi}{2} In my trying, I got the maximum to be max(c,s), but I fear may be I have done some mistake. I got the result by differentiating w.r.t. \theta_1,\theta_2 and vanishing them...but I have ignored the case when \cos\theta_1\cos\theta_2\sin\theta_1\sin\theta_2\ne0. Can anybody help me, please.

Can I say that the function is all time differentiable within its closed and compact domain (the rectangle), the maximum should be attained on boundary?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Plotting in mathematica with different values, I can not find an exception.

But the reasoning of closed, compact domain can not be applied, because though the domain is convex, the function is itself not a convex one. However, we can split the domain such that in each part, the function remains monotonic.
 
Oh, finally I got an answer to this question...the proof is a handy one (according to me, of course!:smile:). The answer is indeed correct.

Since \cos\theta_1\cos\theta_2\sin\theta_1\sin\theta_2\ne0, \cos\theta_1,\cos\theta_2,\sin\theta_1,\sin\theta_2&lt;1.
so

\cos^m\theta_1(c\cos^n\theta_2+s\sin^n\theta_2)+<br /> \sin^m\theta_1 ( c\sin^n\theta_2+s\cos^n\theta_2)

\le <br /> \cos^2\theta_1(c\cos^2\theta_2+s\sin^2\theta_2)+<br /> \sin^2\theta_1 ( c\sin^2\theta_2+s\cos^2\theta_2)

\le\frac{c+s}{2}

&lt;\max\{c,s\}

Regards.
 
Last edited:
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...
Back
Top