Maximum Power Transfer with Negative Thevenin Resistance?

In summary, the conversation discusses a general question about finding the maximum power transfer to a load resistor with a negative Thevenin resistance. The formula for positive cases is given, but it is unclear if it applies to negative cases. The conversation also mentions trying different resistances to find the answer and discusses a sample circuit. It is determined that the power dissipated in the load resistor is unlimited when R = -Rth, and examples of negative resistances in real circuits are mentioned.
  • #1
5
0
Hello everyone! I have a general question about how to find out the maximum power transfer to a load resistor with a negative Thevenin Resistance (Rth < 0). I know for positive cases, P = R*(Vth/(R + Rth))^2, in which R is the load resistor connected to the Thevenin equivalence circuit, and Pmax = (Vth)^2/(4*Rth). But what if Rth < 0? I don't think that the Pmax equation still holds true in negative cases for Rth. Can someone help me explain this phenomenon please? I very much appreciate your help! Thank you.


gta100
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
gta100 said:
Hello everyone! I have a general question about how to find out the maximum power transfer to a load resistor with a negative Thevenin Resistance (Rth < 0). I know for positive cases, P = R*(Vth/(R + Rth))^2, in which R is the load resistor connected to the Thevenin equivalence circuit, and Pmax = (Vth)^2/(4*Rth). But what if Rth < 0? I don't think that the Pmax equation still holds true in negative cases for Rth. Can someone help me explain this phenomenon please? I very much appreciate your help! Thank you.


gta100

Welcome to the PF.

What is a negative Thevenin resistance? Is it physical? Or is it related to some complex impedance (in which case there is a good answer)?
 
  • #3
Hello berkeman! Thank you very much for your reply!

By negative Thevenin resistance, I mean Rth < 0 in the Thevenin equivalent circuit. According to my textbook, negative Rth may appear when there are ONLY DEPENDENT sources inside "the circuit". By "the circuit", I mean the circuitry with CONSTANT PHYSICAL QUANTITIES FOR ALL ELEMENTS and with two terminals connected to a load resistor with a VARYING RESISTANCE (rheostat). I hope that is clear? Thank you!

gta100
 
  • #4
gta100 said:
Hello berkeman! Thank you very much for your reply!

By negative Thevenin resistance, I mean Rth < 0 in the Thevenin equivalent circuit. According to my textbook, negative Rth may appear when there are ONLY DEPENDENT sources inside "the circuit". By "the circuit", I mean the circuitry with CONSTANT PHYSICAL QUANTITIES FOR ALL ELEMENTS and with two terminals connected to a load resistor with a VARYING RESISTANCE (rheostat). I hope that is clear? Thank you!

gta100

So to figure this out, we should take a typical circuit that exhibits negative output resistance, and figure out how to get maximum power to a load impedance (by varying the load impedance in this case).

Can you post a typical circuit that exhibits negative resistance at its two output terminals? And then see if you might be able to answer your own question by trying some different resistances connected to those terminals?
 
  • #5
berkeman said:
So to figure this out, we should take a typical circuit that exhibits negative output resistance, and figure out how to get maximum power to a load impedance (by varying the load impedance in this case).

Can you post a typical circuit that exhibits negative resistance at its two output terminals? And then see if you might be able to answer your own question by trying some different resistances connected to those terminals?

Hi Berkeman! Sure! Let me go ahead and post a sample circuit for you (Please see attachment).

So in this circuit, I find Rth = -15000/11 ohms = - 1363.636364 ohms , and Vth = - 2680/11 V (Also negative). I need to find the maximum power transfer to the rheostat R as indicated.

Thank you for your help!

gta100
 

Attachments

  • Negative Thevenin Resistance.jpg
    Negative Thevenin Resistance.jpg
    31.6 KB · Views: 1,585
  • #6
Forgetting Thevenin equivalent reistance for a moment, have you determined i(R) for arbitrary R?
 
  • #7
Hello rude man! Thank you for your reply.

I have determined i(R) for sure. It is Vth/(R + Rth), right? I actually included it in the formula for the power transferred to the load resistor, namely, P = R*(Vth/(R + Rth))^2.

I even plotted the equation in MATLAB, and it turned out that P will reach infinitely high when R = - Rth (Recall that Rth < 0 now, so R = -Rth > 0). So it seems like there is no max power. Could you help me investigate if I calculated the wrong Rth? I attached the sample problem in my last post. Thank you very much!

gta100
 
  • #8
gta100,

I solved this problem using node analysis, as shown in the attachment. I don't see Thevenin helping very much. Check my node calculations. I show that when R=1363.636364, then the power dissipated in R is 2.962740001E21, a very large number. Included is a plot of the power dissipated.

Ratch
 

Attachments

  • gta100.JPG
    gta100.JPG
    27.2 KB · Views: 1,034
  • #9
gta100 said:
Hello rude man! Thank you for your reply.

I have determined i(R) for sure. It is Vth/(R + Rth), right? I actually included it in the formula for the power transferred to the load resistor, namely, P = R*(Vth/(R + Rth))^2.

I even plotted the equation in MATLAB, and it turned out that P will reach infinitely high when R = - Rth (Recall that Rth < 0 now, so R = -Rth > 0). So it seems like there is no max power. Could you help me investigate if I calculated the wrong Rth? I attached the sample problem in my last post. Thank you very much!

gta100

Yes, the correct value of [itex]R_{thv}=[/itex] is [itex]-\frac{15}{11}k \Omega[/itex]. (Hand calculated the good old fashioned way. :smile:)

Yes the maximum power is unlimited (infinity if you like), as R_L approaches -R_thv.

The direction that Berkeman was trying to point you toward was to consider what type of real circuit components can produce a negative resistance. When you do this you'll find that in all cases the negative resistance is a result of some active component that is only valid over a limited operating range. There is no such thing as a true (or intrinsic) negative resistance.

Common examples of negative resistances are.

1. Small signal linearized examples like the tunnel diode, where both V and I are actually in the same direction, but [itex]dV/dI[/itex] is negative over some limited range of its V/I characteristics.

2. Active circuits using opamps and transistors. (remember that these always have a limited linear operating range).

3. Electro-mechanical systems like motors and generators. Again these will always be subject to a finite operating range.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Hello uart! Thank you very much for your reply! That is very inspirational and reassuring! Thank you for quoting some real-world examples which would produce negative Thevenin resistances!

gta100
 
  • #11
uart,

Yes, the correct value of Rthv= is −1511kΩ. (Hand calculated the good old fashioned way. )

Yes the maximum power is unlimited (infinity if you like), as R_L approaches -R_thv.

Did you check your negative resistance value by finding the power dissipated by R at that negative value? If you did, you would find that the power is a small negative value, which means that mathematically, R is generating power at that negative value. However, at R=1363.636364, the power dissipated is 2.962740001E21, not infinity. See the power plot I posted above.

Ratch
 
  • #12
Ratch said:
uart,
Did you check your negative resistance value by finding the power dissipated by R at that negative value? If you did, you would find that the power is a small negative value, which means that mathematically, R is generating power at that negative value. However, at R=1363.636364, the power dissipated is 2.962740001E21, not infinity. See the power plot I posted above.

Ratch

Hi Ratch. Your results are simply an artifact of the simulation software only evaluating the response at a finite number of discrete values of R.

For any circuit that has a negative Thevenins resistance (and a non zero Thevenins voltage) it is easy to see that if you make the external resistance equal to the absolute value of the Thevenins resistance that the total resistance becomes zero. The current, and therefore the load power, must be infinite.

As I explained to gta100 however, in reality this can never happen, as the active components forming the negative resistance will limit or saturate at some finite level.
 
  • #13
uart,

Your results are simply an artifact of the simulation software only evaluating the response at a finite number of discrete values of R.

I did not use simulation software. As shown in post #8 of this thread, I found the voltage across R by using node analysis. Then using the well known formula V^2/R, I plotted and calculated the R value at the highest power dissipation. That occurs when R is positive, not negative. Anytime R is negative, the resistor is not dissipating power, because V^2/R will always be negative. I stand by my answer of R=1363.636364, and again invite you to calculate the power the resistor dissipates at your value and mine.

Ratch
 
  • #14
Ratch said:
uart,
I did not use simulation software.
Ok your plotting software then.

That occurs when R is positive, not negative. Anytime R is negative, the resistor is not dissipating power, because V^2/R will always be negative. I stand by my answer of R=1363.636364, and again invite you to calculate the power the resistor dissipates at your value and mine.
What are you talking about, they're basically the same value, you just had a decimal approximation. I said to use R = -R_thv, which is positive 15/11 k-ohm. As a decimal this is [itex]1363.\dot{6}\dot{3}\, \Omega[/itex] (that's the .63 repeated).
 
Last edited:
  • #15
uart,

Ok your plotting software then.

My plotting software does "evalute the response at a finite number of discrete values of R". However, that is not what I used to determine the value of R.

I said to use R = -R_thv, which is positive 15/11 k-ohm.

I don't know about the Thevenin value, but if you agree that R is positive, then the matter is resolved.

Ratch
 
Last edited:
  • #16
I don't know about the Thevenin value, but if you agree that R is positive, then the matter is resolved.
I do know about the Thevenin value, and I also know that -(-15/11) is a positive number. So yes this is resolved.
 
  • #17
Ratch said:
My plotting software does "evalute the response at a finite number of discrete values of R". However, that is not what I used to determine the value of R.

Ratch. Are you honestly saying that you cannot see that the maximum value of,
[tex]\frac{2.173 R}{(0.00605R - 8.25)^2}[/tex]
increases without bound as R approaches [itex]\frac{8.25}{0.00605}[/itex]?

* Equation taken from your own working (with factor of [itex]10^{24}[/itex] removed top and bottom).
 
Last edited:
  • #18
uart,

Ratch. Are you honestly saying that you cannot see that the maximum value of,

increases without bound as R approaches 8.250/.00605?

Sure I can. As the denominator goes to zero, the term becomes infinite. I plugged the decimal value of R into V^2/R and got a very high value of dissipated power. Had I used the exact value of R, then I would have gotten infinity.

Ratch
 
  • #19
Ratch said:
I plugged the decimal value of R into V^2/R and got a very high value of dissipated power. Had I used the exact value of R, then I would have gotten infinity.

OK, I'm glad that you've finally realized that. Now we're done.
 
  • #20
uart,

OK, I'm glad that you've finally realized that. Now we're done.

Except for one thing. I did not "finally" realize that, I always knew that I did not have the exact value of R. Therefore I knew that the calculated dissipated power by the approximate R was finite, and not infinite.

Ratch
 
  • #21
Ratch said:
uart,
Except for one thing. I did not "finally" realize that, I always knew that I did not have the exact value of R. Therefore I knew that the calculated dissipated power by the approximate R was finite, and not infinite.

Ok I'm happy to concede that. It was really just your reply #11 that confused me into thinking otherwise. It seems that most of the discussion after reply #10 in this thread is therefore pointless.
 

1. What is the principle behind Maximum Power Transfer with Negative Thevenin Resistance?

The principle behind Maximum Power Transfer with Negative Thevenin Resistance is to find the value of the load resistance that will result in the maximum power transfer from the source to the load. This can be achieved by matching the load resistance with the negative Thevenin resistance of the circuit.

2. How is Negative Thevenin Resistance calculated?

Negative Thevenin Resistance is the negative of the Thevenin resistance of a circuit, which can be calculated by removing the load resistance and finding the equivalent resistance between the output terminals of the circuit.

3. What is the significance of Negative Thevenin Resistance in Maximum Power Transfer?

Negative Thevenin Resistance is significant in Maximum Power Transfer as it helps in determining the load resistance that will result in maximum power transfer. By matching the load resistance with the negative Thevenin resistance, the maximum power can be transferred from the source to the load.

4. Can Maximum Power Transfer be achieved without Negative Thevenin Resistance?

Yes, Maximum Power Transfer can be achieved without Negative Thevenin Resistance, but it requires more complex calculations and may not always result in the maximum power transfer.

5. How does Negative Thevenin Resistance affect the output voltage and current in a circuit?

Negative Thevenin Resistance does not affect the output voltage and current in a circuit. It only helps in determining the load resistance that will result in maximum power transfer, but the output voltage and current will depend on the load resistance and the source voltage and current.

Suggested for: Maximum Power Transfer with Negative Thevenin Resistance?

Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
780
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
602
Replies
7
Views
918
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top