Maxwell Tensor Identity Explained: Deriving Formula 8.23 in Schawrtz's Book

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving formula 8.23 from Schwartz's book, which expresses the square of the Maxwell tensor in terms of the vector potential A. The formula is given as: $$-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu \nu}^{2}=\frac{1}{2}A_{\mu}\square A_{\mu}-\frac{1}{2}A_{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}A_{\nu}$$, where $$F_{\mu\nu}=\partial_{\mu} A_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}$$. Participants confirm that the derivation requires integration by parts, as the equality holds modulo a total derivative, emphasizing that tensor manipulation alone is insufficient for this derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations and tensor calculus
  • Familiarity with the concept of the d'Alembertian operator, denoted as $$\square$$
  • Knowledge of integration by parts in the context of field theory
  • Proficiency in manipulating differential forms and derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the d'Alembertian operator in various coordinate systems
  • Explore integration by parts techniques in the context of field theory
  • Review the properties of total derivatives in tensor calculus
  • Investigate the implications of the Maxwell tensor in electromagnetic theory
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, mathematicians specializing in differential geometry, and students studying advanced electromagnetism and field theory.

dm4b
Messages
363
Reaction score
4
Hello,

In Schawrtz, Page 116, formula 8.23, he seems to suggest that the square of the Maxwell tensor can be expanded out as follows:

$$-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu \nu}^{2}=\frac{1}{2}A_{\mu}\square A_{\mu}-\frac{1}{2}A_{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}A_{\nu}$$

where:

$$F_{\mu\nu}=\partial_{\mu} A_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}$$

For the life of me, I can't seem to derive this. I get close, but always with an extra unwanted term, or two.

Anyone have a hint on the best way to proceed?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
... keeping it under the integral (of S) and differentiating by parts works out here. However, is there a way to achieve this with just tensor manipulation? I thought so, but I may not be remembering correctly.
 
dm4b said:
However, is there a way to achieve this with just tensor manipulation?

No, you need to integrate by parts. The equality sign there is a bit misleading.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
The equality is modulo a total derivative.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K