MCAT Physics: Find Rod Length After 20% Decrease in Pendulum Period

  • Thread starter Thread starter caviar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the decrease in rod length of a pendulum after a 20% reduction in its period. The relevant equation for the period is T = 2π√(l/g), and participants clarify how to rearrange this equation to express length (l) in terms of period (T). The confusion arises over the correct algebraic manipulation, with one participant asserting that the correct formula is l = 4π²gT². The conclusion drawn is that a 20% decrease in period results in a 36% decrease in rod length, leading to some skepticism about the accuracy of this calculation. Overall, the thread highlights the importance of understanding algebraic transformations in solving physics problems.
caviar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The length of the rod of a certain pendulum is decreased, and the period then decreases by 20%. By how much was the rod length decreased?


Homework Equations


T=2π√(l/g)
T=period
l=length of the rod
g=acceleration due to gravity


The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to solve the problem, I just don't know how to do the math to solve for l (length).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you know how to solve the problem, what is then the difficulty that you have?

you have the relevant equation that gives you the period as function of length. But you want to have an expression for the length as function of the period. And then you want an expression that gives you the length for a 20% longer period.
 
I don't understand what you are asking.

Are you saying you don't know how to solve T = 2pi*sqrt(l/g) for l?
Because this is basic algebra: l = g*(T/2pi)^2
 
Sorry for the confusion, yeah I forgot how to do basic algebra and don't understand why this is the answer: l=4π^2gT^2, and not this l=gT^2/4π^2 (what you said and what I think it is too)?

Either way you can still find the answer because when you multiply T by 0.80, you multiply l by 0.64 (0.8^2). So, the length (l) decreases by 36% (1-0.64).
 
Mm, I wouldn't trust that. Must be some sort of misprint or mistake...unless my 6th grade teacher was wrong all this time :o
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top