Mean, variance of non-parametric estimator

  • Thread starter Thread starter rayge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Variance
rayge
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For the nonparameteric estimator \hat{f}(x)=\frac{1}{2hn}\sum\limits_{i=1}^n I_i(x) of a pdf,
(a) Obtain its mean and determine the bias of the estimator
(b) Obtain its variance

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


For (a), I think it goes like this:
E[\hat{f}(x)] = E[\frac{1}{2hn}\sum\limits_{i=1}^n I_i(x)]=\frac{1}{2hn}nE[I_1(X)]=\frac{1}{2h}P(x_h<X<x+h)=\frac{1}{2h}\int_{x-h}^{x+h}f(x)dx=f(\xi_n)

However my professor stated he wants the answer in terms of integrals of f. He doesn't want the answer in terms of \xi, as the function f(\xi) is existential. I'm confused about what he is asking for. (I should probably ask him for clarification rather than strangers, but maybe someone sees something in this that I'm missing.) Maybe it has something to do with taking the limit as h goes to 0; but in this case, I think we get f(x), which is somewhat trivial and not really helpful.

As for obtaining the bias, I think I need to find E[\hat{f}(x)] - \mu. Which I also think becomes f(x) - \mu, which is also trivial.

I think once I understand the key to this I'll understand how to get part (b), but I'm kind of lost. Thanks for any pointers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmm. I don't understand your working. Each ##I_i## is going to be centred at a different place, corresponding to each of your data points, right? So each ##I_i## is a different function, so the expectation is not going to be the same for all of them.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top