Measuring the Discharge Coefficients of a Rocket Injector

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on measuring discharge coefficients (Cd) for a liquid rocket injector during hydro-static tests. The author, Roy S., is collecting data on pressure and flow rates, noting that Cd values vary with injection pressure, which contradicts the expectation of fixed values. Concerns are raised about a measured Cd of approximately 0.33 for the oxidizer line, deemed low for well-formed nozzles. It is clarified that without a nozzle, the Cd cannot be accurately assessed, and flow resistance through tubing can affect measurements. The conversation highlights the importance of nozzle configuration and accurate pressure measurements in determining discharge coefficients.
Roy S Ramirez
Messages
24
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
I build a feed system for a liquid rocket injector, ran water through it, measures pressures and flow rates, and I'm not sure how to calculate the pressure drops and discharge coeffs.
Hello everybody!

I hope you are all doing well. I built a liquid rocket injector and the following feed system:
244819
244820

I started to do hydro-static tests (cold flows) and a program I wrote records all the data for me (except for the flow rates which I measured experimentally by collecting the water with a bucket and measuring the volume*). I know the grad students at my school use this kind of data to measure discharge coefficients, and one of them told me that for the pressure drop across the injector you just use the difference between the injection pressure (which my program records), and the atmospheric pressure. I'm not sure if this true... This a a data sample, where green is the ox line and blue is the fuel line. Both lines were tested individually, and the values plotted are in PSIA vs time, where the pressure belongs to pressure transducers PT-21 and PT-31. It is interesting to note that the PT's spike up some seconds after opening the main valves (FC-21/FC-31) at t=4secs. Also note that PT-31 looks noisy, and this is because the device is defective but it still works fairly enough (it will be replaced).
244821

(A total of 10 individual tests were performed)
For the calculations we have the following:
244822

Here I vary the values of the injection pressures and the flow rates to get the Cd's. After plugging numbers I got:
244824
As you can see, the Cd's are varying with the injection pressure, and I thought they were supposed to be nearly fixed numbers. Also for the oxidizer line I think a Cd of 0.33 ish would be very low, wouldn't it?

Thank you very much,

Roy S.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The real determination of the Cd of the final flow nozzles is, assuming P21 and P31 are very near their nozzle inlets, are respectively P21 and P31 vs flow. Nozzles have a consistent Cd for uniform fluids; but, flow resistance through tubing/piping increases with flow rate.
Without seeing the nozzle configuration it is not possible to comment on the low Cd; but, yes a Cd = .33 would be considered very low for any reasonably formed nozzle.
 
Hello @JBA. I don't have a nozzle attached right now. I only have the injector, and yes, PT21 and PT31 are relatively close to it.
244904

(Cold flow at Zucrow Propulsion Lab two months ago)

PS: I manged to fix the response time issue.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top