Measuring the momentum of a charged particle

Fissi0nable
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am relatively new to particle physics, and I seem to have reached confusion already. I do not seem to comprehend how you could measure the momentum of a charged particle just by exerting force and a magnetic field on it. The formula F = Bqv is mentioned when I hear of this, which does not really help (if anything, it only worsens my confusion). Could anyone please explain in detail how this is done? Much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's consider particles moving perpendicular to the magnetic field: they feel a constant force F=Bqv perpendicular to their direction of motion, so they move in a circle with the radius r where F provides the centripetal acceleration: ##F=\gamma m\frac{v^2}{r}## (γ is the relativistic gamma factor). Combining both, ##Bqv=\gamma m\frac{v^2}{r}## or ##Bq=\frac{p}{r}## where p is the relativistic momentum of the particle. B is known from the detector calibration, r can be measured in the detector. q is usually +1 or -1, so you can calculate p.

In high-energy physics, the magnetic field is not large enough to get a full circle for most particles, but you can consider the track as a part of a circle and determine its radius.

If the particle does not move perpendicular to the magnetic field, you have to consider the momentum parallel to the field as well, but the concept is the same.
 
Thank you very much for your help, mfb. You made it clear. I knew about the circular motion, but I didn't know F played such a big part in calculating the radius. I appreciate your help.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top