Measuring x and ##p_{y}## precisely

  • Thread starter Thread starter gfd43tg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measuring
gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
947
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


upload_2015-3-26_23-32-13.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



1.
$$ [\hat {x}, \hat {p}_{y}] = \hat {x}\hat {p}_{y} - \hat {p}_{y} \hat {x}$$
$$= \hat {x}(-i \hbar \frac {\partial f}{\partial y}) - (- i \hbar \frac {\partial (fx)}{\partial y}) $$
Since x is not a function of y, it can be taken out of the derivative, so the commutator is zero.

However, I have no clue how to answer the next two questions. I am very confused regarding measurements in quantum mechanics. Does it have something to do with Heisenberg Uncertainty principle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maylis said:
I am very confused regarding measurements in quantum mechanics. Does it have something to do with Heisenberg Uncertainty principle?
In this context it indeed does. It can be shown that the product of the imprecisions in the measurements of two observables A and B follows the Heisenberg uncertainty relation:

$$\Delta A \Delta B \geq \frac{1}{2}\left | \left\langle \left[ \hat{A}, \hat{B} \right] \right\rangle \right |$$
With this you can answer the second question.

For the third one, do the exact same thing as you did for the first question: operate with the commutator on a test function f and see if you can rearrange the order of the derivatives so that the result is zero.
 
Since the commutator is zero, does that mean that I can measure it precisely? Because ##\sigma_{x} \sigma_{p_{y}} \ge 0##?
 
That's right, their measurements are not constrained by the uncertainty relation.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top