Archived Mechanical Efficiency of a Ramp

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the mechanical efficiency of a ramp, the efficiency formula η = (W_benefit / W_input) * 100% is used, where W_benefit is the gravitational potential energy (mgh) and W_input is the work done (FD). The work input involves pushing the block up the ramp, while the work benefit is the energy gained at the height. It's important to measure the force with a spring scale while pulling the block parallel to the ramp to ensure accurate readings. Friction affects the efficiency, as it requires additional force to overcome, making real-life ramps less efficient than ideal frictionless scenarios. Accurate measurements of height and length of the ramp are crucial for determining efficiency in a lab setting.
iRamie
Messages
19
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


We have to find the efficiency of a ramp for a lab. We are given an inclined plane, a wooden block and a few masses. We are also given a Newton spring scale.

Homework Equations


efficiency = (Eout/Ein)*100%
Eg = mgh
Work = FD

The Attempt at a Solution


Is the efficiency equal to Eg/Work?
Because the only work i am putting in is me pushing the wooden block up the ramp. That will be the Ein. The Eout will be the gravitational potential energy of the object?


How would i calculate the efficiency of the ramp?
 
  • Like
Likes Nahyo
Physics news on Phys.org
Substitute the Eg value for the Eout value and substitute the work value into the Ein value. Perform the calculation.
 
The ramp is what is called a non-isolated mechanical system.

According to my own high school physics textbook
##W_{intake}= pushing work## (I'm thinking that this is probably correct, but you have laboratory so why not test it out?)
##W_{benefit}= E_{pot.~at ~highpoint}## (probably true as well...)
##W_{wasted} = W_{friction}## (definitely true)

Wintake=Wbenefit+Wwasted

Wintake-Wwasted= Wbenefit
ramp efficiency η = ##\frac { W_{benefit}}{W_{intake}}##Initially static friction will be overcome by the pushing action, and afterwards sliding friction will cause work. Or in other words, friction requires more force in order to be overcome by the ramp-user who pushes the box.
You would have less work required, if the ramp were frictionless. But of course in real-life ramp you most likely have some friction, so therefore more work is required to push the box along the ramp.

Overall, you were on the correct track to solving the problem. The practical problem for you is to simply figure out how you can find out the correct values for Wintake, Wbenefit and Wwasted by using measurement and calculation in the lab.

This is my understanding of the situation and anybody more experrienced is welcome to criticize.

η
= ##\frac {W_{benefit}}{W_{input}}##
 
Measure both the height and the length of the ramp (from the front side of the block to the top. Move the block along the ramp slowly, with constant speed so as the spring scale shows a constant force. Read that force: it is F. The work done is Wintake=FD where D is the length of the ram. You know Wbenefit= mgh, so you can calculate the efficiency
##\eta =\frac {W_{benefit}}{W_{input}}##.
 
  • Like
Likes late347
ehild said:
Measure both the height and the length of the ramp (from the front side of the block to the top. Move the block along the ramp slowly, with constant speed so as the spring scale shows a constant force. Read that force: it is F. The work done is Wintake=FD where D is the length of the ram. You know Wbenefit= mgh, so you can calculate the efficiency
##\eta =\frac {W_{benefit}}{W_{input}}##.

how should you measure the force in practical terms with Newton-scale (spring scale)?

Especially if you are in the lab alone, and you do all work with only your own two hands?

If the pulling force has different direction in the vector compared to the actual angle in which the distance is traveled that could be problematic.

Therefore the pulling should occur at same angle as the ramp itself.

Its probably easier to use the scale with pulling.

If you pull at some constant speed, then I reckon the force reading should stay at a stable value prety much?
 
late347 said:
how should you measure the force in practical terms with Newton-scale (spring scale)?

Especially if you are in the lab alone, and you do all work with only your own two hands?

If the pulling force has different direction in the vector compared to the actual angle in which the distance is traveled that could be problematic.

Therefore the pulling should occur at same angle as the ramp itself.

Its probably easier to use the scale with pulling.

If you pull at some constant speed, then I reckon the force reading should stay at a stable value prety much?
Yes, you attach the block to the spring scale and pull the scale parallel with the ramp, so as the block moves with constant speed. Usually such a ramp is on a lab table and fixed to it, so you need only one hand, like in the picture :smile:
inclined_plane_station.jpg
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top