Mechanical Energy vs Potential Energy & Kinetic Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum speed required for a 10.0-kg hammer to strike a wooden block and propel a 2.0-kg metal bar to ring a bell 9.0 m high. The energy needed to lift the bar is determined using potential energy (Ep = mgh), resulting in 176.58 J. The kinetic energy of the hammer is then calculated using the formula Ek = 1/2mv^2, leading to a corrected minimum speed of approximately 5.9 m/s, significantly lower than the initial erroneous calculation of 104 m/s. The conversation highlights the importance of energy conservation principles in solving mechanical energy problems. Overall, the correct approach clarifies the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in this scenario.
Lexington
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Mechanical Energy vs Potential Energy & Kinetic Energy

I'm pretty sure I did this one wrong, =( please help clarify?

8. At the Calgary Stampede, you can win a prize if the bell rings when you strike a wooden block with a 10.0-kg hammer. The block is at one end of a lever. The other end of the lever drives a 2.0-kg metal bar up a slide to ring the bell 9.0 m above. What is the minimum speed the hammer must be swung to make the bar hit the bell?

Assuming there are no energy losses, the energy required to be transmitted to the 2.0-kg bar can be calculated and used as the kinetic energy required for the hammer.



Ek = 1/2mv^2
Ep = mgh
Em = Ep + Ek
v = √[(2•Ek)/m]




m1 = 10.0kg
m2 = 2.0kg
mt = m2 + m1 = 12.0kg
D = 9.0m

Ep = mgh
= (2.0kg)(9.0m)(9.81m/s^2)
= 176.58 J

Hammer:
h = 0m
v = √[(2•Ek)/m] + mgh
= √[(2•176.58J)/10.0kg] + (10.0kg)(9.81m/s^2)
= 104.042726646919
v = 1.0x10^2 m/s

The hammer should have a velocity of 1.0x10^2 J when it hits the wooden block, causing 1.77x10^2 J of energy on the 2.0kg block.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lexington said:
Hammer:
h = 0m
v = √[(2•Ek)/m] + mgh
= √[(2•176.58J)/10.0kg] + (10.0kg)(9.81m/s^2)*0
:wink:
 
Thank you! 5.9 m/s sounds allot better than 104m/s haha!
 
Lexington said:
Thank you! 5.9 m/s sounds allot better than 104m/s haha!
A pleasure :smile:
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top