Mechanics Part II: P, Q, and F Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter turnstile
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
Two forces, P (5N) and Q (3N), act on a particle at a 40-degree angle. The resultant force F's magnitude is calculated using the components of both forces, where the x-component includes both P and the x-component of Q (3 cos 40). The confusion arises from the need to account for the x-component of force Q in the resultant calculation. The angle between F and P can be determined using the tangent function, which also requires the correct x and y components. Understanding these components is crucial for accurately finding the resultant force and its direction.
turnstile
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Mechanics Part II :)

Hi.
Sorry, i got stuck again.. :smile:

well...

Force.jpg




Two Forces, P and Q, act on a particle. The force P has a magnitude 5N and the force Q has magnitude 3N. The angle between the directions of P and Q is 40 degrees. The RESULTANT of P and Q is F

(a) Find, the magnitude of F

(b) Find, in degrees to one decimal place the angle between the directions of F and P.

------
Now, my stab at part (a) was in the form
F^2 = Fx^2 + Fy^2
- = (5cos 40)^2 + (3sin 40)^2
However, it gives me a different answer to the mark scheme...
who have... (5+ 3cos40)^2 + (3 in 40)^2 ...

Why the 5 +3 cos40 ... i don't really get it...

Any help would be greatly appreciated. :confused:

(b) similarly for this.. my version would be ; tan(theta)= Fy / Fx ..but then for Fx... there would be 5+3cos 40... which i don't really understand how you get...

THANKS :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Take the direction of P to be along the x-direction. Thus the x-component of F will be Px + Qx. But Px = 5 N and Qx = 3 cos(40) N, so Fx = 5 + 3 cos(40).
 
ah... so you have to take the x component for force Q as well... correct?

and there will be no y component for force P.. since well.. there isn't one...

Yeah?
 
turnstile said:
ah... so you have to take the x component for force Q as well... correct?
Of course.

and there will be no y component for force P.. since well.. there isn't one...
Right. Because we cleverly chose our x-axis to be parallel to P.
 
last question..

are you god? :D ...

Thank you so much.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top