Yes, that is correct. This is known as the critical velocity for a pendulum.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the critical velocity (c) for a pendulum to reach its highest point. The problem involves a pendulum with a weightless rod and a bob, where only gravity acts on it. Participants emphasize using conservation of energy principles, equating kinetic energy at the lowest point to potential energy at the highest point. The equation derived is 1/2mc^2 = 2mgl, leading to the conclusion that solving for c will provide the critical velocity needed for the pendulum to reach the top. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding energy transformations in mechanics.
ElDavidas
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Got another question for everyone.

I've been looking over some exam past papers for mechanics and I'm stuck on a problem.

Question reads:

"Suppose that a planar pendulum has a weightless rod of length l and a pendulum bob of mass m. The only external force acting on the pendulum is gravity of magnitude mg.

There is a number c such that, if the pendulum bob passes through the downward position with a speed of magnitude > c, it will eventually pass through the upward vertical position, and if it passes through the downward vertical position with a speed of magnitude < c, it will never reach the upward vertical position. Determine the number c. Neglect friction forces in this problem."

There is a diagram that goes with this problem but it's going to be difficult to draw. Basically comprises of a horizontal y-axis (pointing right), a vertical x-axis (pointing downwards) and a vector drawn with an angle delta between the vector and the x axis.

I'm fairly certain you have to use conservation of energy but don't really know where to begin. I understand the concept of conservation of energy but don't know how to apply it to problems.

Thanks

Dave
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alright, you know the formula for kinetic energy is E_K=\frac{1}{2}mv^2 and the formula for gravitational potential energy near the surface of the Earth is E_P=mgh. m is the mass of the object, v is its velocity, h is the hieght and g is acceleration due to gravity. You know that E_K+E_P=E=constant. So what you need to do is find the kinetic and potential energies at the initial and final stages of this process. Keep in mind that it does not matter where you choose h to be zero, since only changes in hieght matter. A convenient place would be at the bottom of the pendulum. Think about what the kinetic enrgy should be at the top. Remember: we want to find the minimum
energy we need to put in for the mass to reach the top.
 
Ok, I think I follow you.

Been looking over my mechanics notes and they say:
T2 - T1 = V2 - V1

where Ti, Vi represent kinetic and potential energies respectively at times t1 and t2.

So if I make the height 0 at the bottom of the pendulum, this would mean the height of the top of the pendulum is 2l (l is the length of the rod).

Using the formula for potential energy, this implies

V2 - V1 = 2mgl - mg(0) = 2mgl ?

Not quite sure about what to do with the kinetic energies. If the velocity is > c (and therefore the pendulum reaches the top) then can I say:

T2 - T1 = 1/2mc^2 - 1/2mc^2

and if the velocity is < c then

T2 - T1 = 1/2mc^2 ?

Don't think the kinetic energy is right though.
 
ElDavidas:
Remember that the minimum velocity c that achieves this, is that all kinetic energy at the bottom position becomes converted into potential energy at the top position.
 
arildno said:
Remember that the minimum velocity c that achieves this, is that all kinetic energy at the bottom position becomes converted into potential energy at the top position.

Hmmm, ok. So does this mean you let

1/2mc^2 = 2mgl

and solve for c?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Back
Top