Mechanism allowing a blade to cut through tissue?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ouabache
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cut Mechanism
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of cutting with different types of knives, particularly focusing on the differences between a butter knife and a razor-sharp knife when cutting through biological tissues like tomatoes or skin. A sharp knife cuts more effectively due to its narrower edge, which increases pressure on the cutting surface, allowing it to overcome the cohesive and adhesive forces that hold the tissue together. This pressure, defined as force per unit area, results in greater stress concentration, enabling the blade to shear through the tissue more efficiently. The conversation also touches on the microscopic interactions between the blade and macromolecules in the tissue, suggesting that a thinner blade can distribute forces more effectively, leading to smoother cuts with less tearing. The mention of obsidian blades highlights the advantages of extremely sharp edges in surgical applications, as they minimize damage and scarring by cutting at a molecular level. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of blade sharpness and pressure in the cutting process, linking physical principles to biological outcomes.
Ouabache
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,345
Reaction score
8
Here is a question posed to me recently that I'd like to post for discussion. It has elements of biology and physics.

A butter knife does a poor job of cutting through a tomato or your hand, whereas a razor sharp knife cuts through quite easily.
Why is this so? What mechanism is at work at the microscopic or molecular level? As the thickness of a blade becomes narrower, does it reach some critical dimension allowing it to separate the bonds of molecules along the cutting plane?

Some thoughts; as you move though a cross-section of any tissue, there are non-uniform cohesive and adhesive forces holding it together. I am thinking these forces are related to the bond-energies holding the molecules together. The case of the butter knife might be easier to think about. The tip edge is "relatively" wide or blunt. As you cut, the surface is pressing over a wider area and pushes against cells or groups of cells. If you push hard enough, it will cut though tissue, but not very evenly, across the cutting plane.. Perhaps the downward force of a butterknife tears the tissue, with the weakest molecular bonds pulling apart initially and then successively stronger bonds breaking, until the tissue separates completely.

So what is the mechanism that allows a sharp blade to easily cut though biological tissue?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
From a physics perspective, the more pressure you apply to something, the more apt it is to deform (i.e., be cut in this instance). Since pressure is force per unit area, and the area of the blade in contact with the tissue/tomato is smaller on a sharp blade than on a dull blade,, the pressure is increased.
 
I imagine it is simply stress concentration. A butter knife could cut with sufficient speed or pressure, but it would make an ugly wound. The sharper the blade the more concentrated the stress (shear) on the tissue.

Stress-strain => Strain energy density, which may be key.
 
Great comments so far.. Now consider this at the microscopic level, how is the thinner blade interacting with the macromolecules of the tissue (proteins, lipoproteins, carbon-chained cellulose matrices)? How are the forces being distributed to these macromolecules to allow a smooth tangential shear along the cutting plane?
 
You may wish to google on "plastic surgery" and "obsidian". I learned how to knap flint and obsidian years ago, and the guy who put the course together sold his obsidian flakes to be used as scalpel blades. The flakes are essentially 1 molecule or so thick at the edge, making them sharper than razors or conventional scalpels, and less likely to cause tearing and scarring during surgery.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top