Medical physics and medicine

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Collaboration between doctors, medical physicists, and engineers is essential in the design and development of medical equipment, particularly in the context of real-time MRI for Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT). While engineers primarily handle the technical aspects, doctors and medical physicists contribute significantly to creating user-friendly workflows and quality assurance tools. The discussion highlights that medical physicists in the U.S. are primarily involved in treatment rather than equipment design, yet their input remains valuable in clinical settings. The presence of medical professionals on advisory boards further emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in medical device development.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of medical physics and its role in treatment.
  • Familiarity with medical device development processes.
  • Knowledge of quality assurance (QA) practices in medical technology.
  • Awareness of Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) principles.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of medical physicists in clinical settings.
  • Explore the design processes of medical devices, focusing on collaboration between disciplines.
  • Learn about quality assurance tools used in medical equipment development.
  • Investigate the impact of real-time MRI technology on radiation therapy outcomes.
USEFUL FOR

Medical professionals, biomedical engineers, and anyone involved in the development and implementation of medical technologies, particularly those interested in the intersection of medicine and engineering.

|mathematix|
Messages
46
Reaction score
2
Do doctors (people who did medicine at university, be it MBBS or MD) get to collaborate with medical physicists and medical engineers to design, research and develop medical equipment and machines? Or is this the job of medical scientists and doctors only get to use the equipment?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
The term "doctor" is extremely ambiguous. More times than not medical scientists are doctors. Are you asking if general practitioners (family medical doctors) play important roles in medical device development, i'd guess not very much. It's like asking if an auto shop mechanic plays an important role in designing a new engine.
 
in the US, medical physicists are only for treatment, they don't design the equipments, the engineers do, which they don't really need to collaborate because the doctors arent the ones using the equipments, the technicians do.
 
I beg to differ. At my company we have had to collaborate with both radiation oncologists in order to design a treatment planning system but also medical physicists and technicians in order to design a user friendly and streamlined workflow. In addition, we have 3 medical physicists on staff to help with designing QA tools necessary for performing quality assurance on the device (FYI, our device is a real time MRI for IGRT). Granted, the majority of work is done by the engineers, but there is room for doctors and MPs (several sit on both our Clinical Advisory Board and Scientific Advisory Board - our founder is an AMP).
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
696
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K