Medical Physics Program: Duke or Georgia Tech

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the decision-making process for choosing between Duke University and Georgia Tech for a Master's in Medical Physics. Participants explore various aspects of both programs, including academic reputation, clinical opportunities, student experiences, and financial considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention that Duke is recognized for having one of the top medical physics programs and offers good access to clinical work due to its proximity to a hospital, although not all students may get rotation opportunities.
  • Others note that Duke has a larger faculty, which may provide a wider variety of perspectives, and that it reportedly has a higher rate of students securing residency placements.
  • In contrast, Georgia Tech is described as having a smaller faculty but collaborates with Emory University Hospital to enhance student exposure to professionals in the field.
  • Participants highlight that Georgia Tech includes a mandatory clinical rotation, which is perceived to prepare students well for their careers, and that its students are considered competitive for residency placements.
  • Concerns about the student experience are raised, with some suggesting that Duke students may be more competitive and less supportive, while Georgia Tech students are perceived to be more collaborative.
  • One participant emphasizes the difficulty of assessing the student experience due to variability from year to year and suggests that factors like group work and faculty engagement can influence the atmosphere.
  • Financial considerations are also discussed, with Georgia Tech having lower tuition but a higher cost of living compared to Duke.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions about the strengths and weaknesses of each program, indicating that multiple competing views remain. There is no consensus on which program is superior, as both have distinct advantages and challenges.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that much of the information shared is based on personal opinions or hearsay, and there are limitations in assessing the student experience and program effectiveness without direct experience.

Who May Find This Useful

Prospective students considering a Master's in Medical Physics, particularly those weighing the merits of different programs and seeking insights into student experiences and career outcomes.

bryceisbored
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am trying to decided between attending Duke or Georgia Tech for a Master's in Medical Physics. I would be very grateful for any opinions on the matter. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you learned about each program so far?

What factors are most important to you?
 
Choppy said:
What have you learned about each program so far?

What factors are most important to you?

I feel that a lot of what I have heard is personal opinions or hearsay, and hence my desire to learn as much as I can about the two programs.

But I have heard that Duke has one of the top medical physics programs and has a good deal of recognition in the field. Has a hospital near by which makes clinical work very accessible, however I heard that not every student will be able to do rotations at that hospital and for the most part the work that is done is just shadowing. Large faculty with a wide variety of professors. And I have heard that it has a high(er) rate of students placing into residency programs. Tuition is high but cost of living is low.

Georgia Tech has a smaller professor base but that to insure that students still have exposure to many different professionals they have Emory University Hospital medical physicists teach some classes on campus. They also have a Varian Clinac for students to get hands on knowledge. There is a mandatory clinical rotation, and from what I heard the clinical experience is very good at preparing students for future careers. One thing I heard is that Georgia Tech students are just as competitive for residency as Duke students. Tuition is lower but cost of living is higher.

As far as research goes, I have not been able to determine much. But as I am only planning on getting a Master's degree this is not something I am too concerned with.

Being able to get into a residency program after I finish with the program is pretty important to me. But another big factor to me is the student to student experience that is most common during the program. From what I heard Duke students are more competitive and less likely to be helpful and supportive to other students and that Georgia Tech Students are the other way around.

But like I said, most of this is hearsay and other peoples personal opinions. I just want to hear what as many people as I can have to say about the two schools so that I can make an informed decision.
 
Unfortunately, I don't have any direct experience with either of these programs to really offer much of an opinion. I am a medical physicist, though and can perhaps offer some general insight.

With respect to the student experience - it's great that you're trying to factor this into your decision. The only problem though, is that it's very difficult to estimate what that's going to be like year-to-year. Graduate programs in medical physics tend to be small. So the student environment is highly dependent on the individual students that come in for any given year. The program can influence things in some ways though. Encouraging group work, for example, tends to foster a less competitive atmosphere. And when the professors are social, it can really help to make for a better experience too. These kinds of factors are difficult to assess via a web page though. It really helps to visit the campus if that's at all possible.

Ultimately I suspect this will come down to a decision between two good options. Sometimes these are the hardest kinds of choices to make because you can't objectively identify one as superior to the other. Under such circumstances, it's okay to fall back to subjective criteria. Which one is going to cost you less? Which one is in a nicer location for you? Which one has better facilities for graduate students?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K