Medical physics: undergraduate approach

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the educational pathways for pursuing a career in medical physics, particularly focusing on whether an undergraduate degree in nuclear engineering or physics provides a stronger foundation for graduate studies in medical physics. Participants explore various related fields, such as health physics and the relevance of biology and chemistry courses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a double major in physics and biology/biochemistry may be beneficial for medical physics.
  • Others note that many medical physicists have undergraduate degrees in physics rather than nuclear engineering, but acknowledge that nuclear engineering does not preclude entry into medical physics.
  • It is mentioned that undergraduate nuclear engineering courses often focus on core physics and applications related to nuclear reactors, with limited relevance to health physics.
  • Some participants argue that a degree in biology/chemistry/pre-med, supplemented with relevant physics electives, might be a more suitable path for entering medical physics.
  • Concerns are raised about whether a nuclear engineering curriculum might leave a knowledge deficit in physics necessary for medical physics programs.
  • Questions are posed regarding the specifics of a radiological concentration in nuclear engineering and its relationship to dosimetry and medical physics.
  • Participants discuss the entry standards for CAMPEP accredited programs, noting that a bachelor's degree in physics or a closely related discipline is typically required, along with GPA expectations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the best undergraduate path for medical physics, with multiple competing views on the relevance of nuclear engineering versus physics, and the importance of biology and chemistry courses. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal educational background for aspiring medical physicists.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the specific content of nuclear engineering programs and their applicability to medical physics. There are also varying interpretations of what constitutes dosimetry and its relation to medical physics.

cseal
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have a strong interest in nuclear science, especially medical physics, and I'll soon be transferring from a community college to a university that has, I believe, a very strong nuclear engineering department. Will undergraduate study in nuclear engineering or physics provide a more solid foundation for a medical physics program at the graduate level?

I'm also open to the possibility of becoming interested in nuclear power or disliking the field altogether, but, being at a community college, I don't have access to introductory NE courses; however, I recently bought Atoms, Radiation, and Radiation Protection by James E. Turner and love it so far.

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
cseal said:
Hello all,

I have a strong interest in nuclear science, especially medical physics, and I'll soon be transferring from a community college to a university that has, I believe, a very strong nuclear engineering department. Will undergraduate study in nuclear engineering or physics provide a more solid foundation for a medical physics program at the graduate level?

I'm also open to the possibility of becoming interested in nuclear power or disliking the field altogether, but, being at a community college, I don't have access to introductory NE courses; however, I recently bought Atoms, Radiation, and Radiation Protection by James E. Turner and love it so far.

Thanks
One might be more interested in Health Physics, or Radiation Health Physics, which is sometimes offered in a Nuclear Engineering program at some schools.

Usually, this means taking courses in Chemistry and Biology, and perhaps Biochemistry, in order to understand the complex cellular mechanisms, and my radiolysis and ionization are particularly important/significant with respect to cellular chemistry.
 
If you've got the option of a double major, physics and biology/biochem would seem to be the best route to me.
 
I know a lot more medical physicists who have started with an undergraduate degree in physics than those who have started with an undergraduate degree in nuclear engineering. I don't think that nuclear engineering necessarily closes the door to medical physics though. You might want to inquire if any graduates of the specific nuclear engineering program you're interested in have gone on into medical physics graduate programs.
 
Most undergraduate nuclear engineering courses are going to be focused on core physics and thermohydraulic applications of nuclear reactors. There's only a few courses that I remember taking which would be of particular use to HP fields - one was a radiation & materials course and one was a radiation transport course. It would probably make more sense to go with a biology/chemistry/pre-med degree and just take those particular courses as electives.
 
QuantumPion said:
It would probably make more sense to go with a biology/chemistry/pre-med degree and just take those particular courses as electives.

In my experience an undergraduate degree in physics will qualify you for enty into all medical physics programs. A biology/chemistry/pre-med degree will not - even if you have a few electives in physics.
 
Thanks for the replies, everyone.

Astronuc, the NE department has a radiological concentration available for their undergraduate degree.

QuantumPion, I'll be transferring with A.S. of chemistry, so I was planning to take some 300 and 400 level chemistry classes, such as biochemistry, as technical electives.

Choppy, do you think that an NE curriculum will leave me with a knowledge deficit in physics? Is a radiological concentration in NE more tailored to dosimetry; are dosimetry and medical physics vastly different? What kind of entry standards do CAMPEP accredited programs have?
 
cseal said:
Choppy, do you think that an NE curriculum will leave me with a knowledge deficit in physics?
I can't really say as I'm not particularly familiar with what's covered in a nuclear engineering undergraduate program. I suspect that it would qualify you for most medical physics programs though. I do know that a bachelor's degree in physics definitely qualifies you.

Is a radiological concentration in NE more tailored to dosimetry; are dosimetry and medical physics vastly different?
Again I don't know the details of your particular program or what "radiological concentration" is. "Dosimetry" can also mean different things. In some contexts it can refer to the measurement of radiation dose. In others it can refer to radiation therapy treatment planning. Both are aspects of medical physics, but beyond these a typical medical physics program would also include x-ray-based imaging, MRI, radiobiology, anatomy and physiology, health physics, nuclear medicine, and a grab-bag of other stuff like electronics, computer networks, programing, lab work, etc.

What kind of entry standards do CAMPEP accredited programs have?
Probably the best way to figure this out is to go through the list of accredited programs and look up the requirements for any school that you might be interested in attending.
http://www.campep.org/campeplstgrad.asp
Accredited programs are supposed to publish basic admissions and graduation statistics.
Generally speaking, incoming students are expected to have a bachelor's degree in physics or a closely related discipline. My understanding is that in the US there may be a little more flexibility in the details, but this will vary from school to school. Some programs are branches of the physics department and thus, students are required to go through the same qualifying examinations as students in other branches of physics. Other programs are more independent and run through medical or oncology departments.

GPA requirements are typically set around a 3.0, but competitive applicants typically have GPAs in the 3.5+ range. This again will vary from program to program and year to year and can depend on who else applies to the program.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K