Memorizing math and physics "building blocks?"

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the challenges of memorizing mathematical theorems and physics equations, particularly in the context of courses like linear algebra and dynamics. Participants emphasize that while memorization can be helpful, understanding the underlying concepts is crucial for long-term retention and application. Tools like SuperMemo and spaced repetition are mentioned as effective methods for reinforcing memory, but there's a consensus that solving numerous problems is more beneficial than relying solely on flashcards. The complexity of certain formulas, especially in dynamics, raises questions about the practicality of memorization versus derivation. Ultimately, the value of memorizing complicated formulas is debated, with suggestions to seek guidance from professors regarding exam expectations and to focus on visualization techniques to simplify complex concepts.
x86
Gold Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
18
I know a lot of courses like linear algebra have a ton of "building blocks" that one must memorize. Yes, you can derive these things yourself, but this often takes to long.

Does anyone here use any tools like SuperMemo to memorize math theorems or physics laws/equations/etc?

Also, I just started taking a dynamics course and some formulas for the polar coordinate system are incredibly time consuming to derive (namely acceleration). Are things like this worth memorizing? Does anyone have advice? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually the important things you end up remembering just because you use them often enough.
 
axmls said:
Usually the important things you end up remembering just because you use them often enough.
This. No amount of flashcard websites will make up for just doing 100 problems with the required theorems.
 
x86 said:
I just started taking a dynamics course and some formulas for the polar coordinate system are incredibly time consuming to derive (namely acceleration). Are things like this worth memorizing?

Ask your professor whether he expects you to be able to remember complicated (but still important) formulas for an exam. My favorite example of these are the formulas for divergence, gradient and curl in spherical and cylindrical coordinates. I've always told students that they will have a reference sheet available for things like this (e.g. a copy of the table in the inside cover of their textbook).
 
I know a lot of courses like linear algebra have a ton of "building blocks" that one must memorize. Yes, you can derive these things yourself, but this often takes to long.

Linear algebra, in particular, is a subject where you don't have to memorize much by rote, if you are doing it right. In some sense, I have most of the subject "memorized" (I mean what's covered in an undergradate course). I know it by heart. But I understand it, I don't just remember the results without knowing why they are true. I can re-derive the theorems in a fraction of a second, visually in my mind. For example, I know that the determinant is a signed volume of a parallelopiped spanned by the column vectors, so if it is zero, then you get a degenerate parallelopiped, so that the vectors don't span the whole space. Sometimes, you can memorize results by rote as a crutch if you don't have time or inclination to try to understand them, but it's hard for it to stick that way, and your ability to apply it will be more rigid. If you need to use a result that is slightly different, but uses the same idea, if you have understanding, you can make that modification, but know it by rote only, then you're stuck.

Does anyone here use any tools like SuperMemo to memorize math theorems or physics laws/equations/etc?

I think understanding is more important than memory, but I do use spaced repetition, which SuperMemo, I think, is based on. I just got a feel for how much review I needed and how to space in order to plant things in long term memory.

Also, I just started taking a dynamics course and some formulas for the polar coordinate system are incredibly time consuming to derive (namely acceleration). Are things like this worth memorizing? Does anyone have advice? Thanks

Probably not if it's super complicated. But sometimes, the seemingly complicated is actually simple, if you look at it from just the right viewpoint. It takes experience to know how to do that, though. Completely aside from whether it's useful (it generally is, when successful, but the question is whether it's worth spending the time to figure out, which it may not be for really ugly formulas, and in any case, you can always come back to it later), I like to try to visualize even fairly complicated stuff, and sometimes that does the trick of making it simple (and memorable).
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top