Mesh Analysis: Solving for I1 with Loop Equations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around using mesh current analysis to determine the current I1 in a circuit. Participants explore various loop equations and attempt to solve for I1 through algebraic manipulation and matrix methods. The conversation includes technical details, calculations, and corrections related to the equations derived from the mesh analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants present loop equations for mesh analysis, including complex numbers and impedance.
  • Multiple attempts to isolate I1 are made, with varying results and methods, including matrix approaches.
  • There are corrections regarding the voltage values and signs in the equations, with some participants questioning earlier calculations.
  • Discrepancies in the calculated angles for I1 are noted, with participants providing different methods for determining the angle.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the correctness of their calculations and seek validation from others.
  • There is discussion about the use of arctan and the importance of considering the signs of the arguments to determine the correct quadrant for angles.
  • Participants explore alternative methods for calculations, such as using the atan2 function for angle determination.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct value of I1, as different calculations yield varying results. There are multiple competing views on the correct approach and the accuracy of the calculations presented.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations appear to have missing assumptions or unresolved mathematical steps, particularly regarding the handling of complex numbers and angle determination. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and methods without resolving the discrepancies.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and practitioners interested in circuit analysis, particularly those learning about mesh current analysis and complex impedance in electrical engineering.

  • #31
i2=(-100i1-j10)/25=-10(10i1-j)/25=-2(10i1-j)/5

i2=-2(10(0.093<-98.86)-j)/5

Honestly I don't know how to continue
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
shaltera said:
i2=(-100i1-j10)/25=-10(10i1-j)/25=-2(10i1-j10)/5

Okay, but simpler:

##i_2 = -4 i_1 - j\frac{10}{25}##

EDIT: and use the rectangular version of i1 to plug in.
 
  • #33
i2=-4(0.093<-98.86)-j10/25=-4(-0.0143+j0.091)-j0.4=0.052-j0.364-j0.4=0.052-j0.764
 
  • #34
shaltera said:
Equation above have two unknown,if I replace i1 with 0.093<-98.86 look mess

Only i2 is unknown. Convert i1 to rectangular form before plugging it in.

Note that you should make a habit of keeping more digits in intermediate values! Otherwise repeated conversions and calculations will cause rounding and truncation errors to creep into your results (especially for angular values). Always keep extra guard digits!
 
Last edited:
  • #35
0.052-j0.764=sqr(0.0522+(-0.764)2tan -1(-(0.764/0.052)=0.765<-86.106
 
  • #36
shaltera said:
0.052-j0.764

What is that? If it's i2 it doesn't look right. Show your steps.
 
  • #37
i1=0.093<-98.86

I converted polar form to complex numbers for i1
-0.0143+j0.091 then I entered in

i2=--4i1-j10/25
i2=-4(-0.0143+j0.091)-j0.4=0.052-j0.364-j0.4=0.052-j0.764
i2=0.052-j0.764=sqr(0.0522+(-0.764)2)tan -1(-(0.764/0.052)=0.765<-86.106
 
  • #38
shaltera said:
i1=0.093<-98.86

I converted polar form to complex numbers for i1
-0.0143+j0.091 then I entered in
Should be: -0.0143 - j0.0911
Check your conversion. You should note that an angle of -98.86° places it in the third quadrant, so both terms must be negative.

i2=--4i1-j10/25
i2=-4(-0.0143+j0.091)-j0.4=0.052-j0.364-j0.4=0.052-j0.764
i2=0.052-j0.764=sqr(0.0522+(-0.764)2)tan -1(-(0.764/0.052)=0.765<-86.106
 
  • #39
I calculated with Matlab

for I1=-0.0143-0.0911i=0.0922<-98.9040
for I2= 0.0571-0.0356i=0.0673<-31.9553

I don't get it why we have to calculate by hand?
 
  • #40
Can I use Matlab for my assessment?

a=[47+100j 100j;100j 25j]
b=[12;10]
i=a\b

then magn=abs(i)
and then the angle
angle(i)*180/pi

Why do we have to calculate by hand?I'm not living in 20 century
 
  • #41
shaltera said:
I calculated with Matlab

for I1=-0.0143-0.0911i=0.0922<-98.9040
for I2= 0.0571-0.0356i=0.0673<-31.9553

I don't get it why we have to calculate by hand?

Yes, those values look good. As to why you have to calculate by hand, I can only presume that there are "pedagogical reasons"; You'll have to ask your instructor.
 
  • #42
shaltera said:
Can I use Matlab for my assessment?

a=[47+100j 100j;100j 25j]
b=[12;10]
i=a\b

then magn=abs(i)
and then the angle
angle(i)*180/pi

Why do we have to calculate by hand?I'm not living in 20 century

Who says you have to calculate by hand? Your instructor? Many instructors will require you to calculate by hand for a while so that you learn how complex arithmetic works. But, after a while, you should be able to use modern software or calculators.
 
  • #43
Apart of Matlab, I do not have a calculator with atan2 function.I was looking for a formula to convert polar to rectangular form but all examples are with positive values
 
  • #44
Many calculators have built-in polar to rectangular (and back) functions. They will accomplish the same thing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K