Mesh Analysis: Solving for I1 with Loop Equations

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on using mesh current analysis to solve for the current I1 in a circuit, involving complex equations derived from two loops. Participants share their attempts at solving the equations, with some discrepancies in calculations and angles noted. There are discussions about the accuracy of angles derived from arctan functions and the importance of maintaining correct signs in calculations. The use of MATLAB for solving the equations is mentioned, with some expressing frustration about needing to perform calculations by hand. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the need for careful algebraic manipulation and understanding of complex numbers in circuit analysis.
  • #31
i2=(-100i1-j10)/25=-10(10i1-j)/25=-2(10i1-j)/5

i2=-2(10(0.093<-98.86)-j)/5

Honestly I don't know how to continue
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
shaltera said:
i2=(-100i1-j10)/25=-10(10i1-j)/25=-2(10i1-j10)/5

Okay, but simpler:

##i_2 = -4 i_1 - j\frac{10}{25}##

EDIT: and use the rectangular version of i1 to plug in.
 
  • #33
i2=-4(0.093<-98.86)-j10/25=-4(-0.0143+j0.091)-j0.4=0.052-j0.364-j0.4=0.052-j0.764
 
  • #34
shaltera said:
Equation above have two unknown,if I replace i1 with 0.093<-98.86 look mess

Only i2 is unknown. Convert i1 to rectangular form before plugging it in.

Note that you should make a habit of keeping more digits in intermediate values! Otherwise repeated conversions and calculations will cause rounding and truncation errors to creep into your results (especially for angular values). Always keep extra guard digits!
 
Last edited:
  • #35
0.052-j0.764=sqr(0.0522+(-0.764)2tan -1(-(0.764/0.052)=0.765<-86.106
 
  • #36
shaltera said:
0.052-j0.764

What is that? If it's i2 it doesn't look right. Show your steps.
 
  • #37
i1=0.093<-98.86

I converted polar form to complex numbers for i1
-0.0143+j0.091 then I entered in

i2=--4i1-j10/25
i2=-4(-0.0143+j0.091)-j0.4=0.052-j0.364-j0.4=0.052-j0.764
i2=0.052-j0.764=sqr(0.0522+(-0.764)2)tan -1(-(0.764/0.052)=0.765<-86.106
 
  • #38
shaltera said:
i1=0.093<-98.86

I converted polar form to complex numbers for i1
-0.0143+j0.091 then I entered in
Should be: -0.0143 - j0.0911
Check your conversion. You should note that an angle of -98.86° places it in the third quadrant, so both terms must be negative.

i2=--4i1-j10/25
i2=-4(-0.0143+j0.091)-j0.4=0.052-j0.364-j0.4=0.052-j0.764
i2=0.052-j0.764=sqr(0.0522+(-0.764)2)tan -1(-(0.764/0.052)=0.765<-86.106
 
  • #39
I calculated with Matlab

for I1=-0.0143-0.0911i=0.0922<-98.9040
for I2= 0.0571-0.0356i=0.0673<-31.9553

I don't get it why we have to calculate by hand?
 
  • #40
Can I use Matlab for my assessment?

a=[47+100j 100j;100j 25j]
b=[12;10]
i=a\b

then magn=abs(i)
and then the angle
angle(i)*180/pi

Why do we have to calculate by hand?I'm not living in 20 century
 
  • #41
shaltera said:
I calculated with Matlab

for I1=-0.0143-0.0911i=0.0922<-98.9040
for I2= 0.0571-0.0356i=0.0673<-31.9553

I don't get it why we have to calculate by hand?

Yes, those values look good. As to why you have to calculate by hand, I can only presume that there are "pedagogical reasons"; You'll have to ask your instructor.
 
  • #42
shaltera said:
Can I use Matlab for my assessment?

a=[47+100j 100j;100j 25j]
b=[12;10]
i=a\b

then magn=abs(i)
and then the angle
angle(i)*180/pi

Why do we have to calculate by hand?I'm not living in 20 century

Who says you have to calculate by hand? Your instructor? Many instructors will require you to calculate by hand for a while so that you learn how complex arithmetic works. But, after a while, you should be able to use modern software or calculators.
 
  • #43
Apart of Matlab, I do not have a calculator with atan2 function.I was looking for a formula to convert polar to rectangular form but all examples are with positive values
 
  • #44
Many calculators have built-in polar to rectangular (and back) functions. They will accomplish the same thing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K