The discussion centers on a video capturing a flying object in Oklahoma, with participants debating whether it is a micrometeorite or something else. A key point made is that a meteorite is only classified as such after it has landed, while in flight, it remains a meteor. Concerns are raised about the object's glowing behavior, which is atypical for meteors that usually burn up at high altitudes. Some suggest the phenomenon could be a lens flare or reflection rather than a meteor, citing the motion and characteristics of the object. Overall, skepticism about the object's classification as a meteor prevails among participants.
firstly, just for your info ... a meteorite is only that after it has hit the ground, whilst in flight, its still a meteor
secondly ... don't know if you could call this a meteor. Meteors are not known for glowing all the way to the ground unless they are really massive
the "burning up" phase for all others takes place high in the atmosphere, 50 ++ km
I really don't know what has been captured there on video, but I seriously doubt that it was a meteor
The lens flare explanation in the comments there looks very reasonable. Some moving light source somewhere else got seen by the camera.
The motion does not fit to a meteor.
#4
mp3car
82
7
I later found a video where two local professors claimed it was likely a meteor... HOWEVER, those professors are not very well accredited to be weighing in on this subject; one holds a BS in Meteorology (ironically, doesn't make them an expert on meteors, despite the name), and the other one appears to have only taught 1000 and 2000 level math courses like college algebra and calc I...
I found this, which agrees exactly with what Dave said... "All but the largest meteors (like the one that formed Meteor Crater) quit burning and fall dark from an altitude of from 5 to 20 km (3.2 to 12.4 miles)." So... Even choosing the low end, this "appeared" to get much closer to the ground than 5km before going dark.
Item number 48A on http://meteorites.wustl.edu/realities.htm which links to: http://www.meteoritemarket.com/metid2.htm
Perhaps I'll reach out to a PhD-level astrophysicist at a reputable university, but probably shouldn't waste their time, I think you guys are right - it most likely was a lens flare/reflection of some kind...
Partial solar eclipse from Twizel, South Isl., New Zealand ...
almost missed it due to cloud, didnt see max at 0710 NZST as it went back into cloud.
20250922, 0701NZST
Canon 6D II 70-200mm @200mm,
F4, 100th sec, 1600ISO
Makeshift solar filter made out of solar eclipse sunglasses
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic?
There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs.
Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed).
n.b. I start this...