Min/Max angle of a force applied to stationary mass.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the maximum and minimum angles at which a horizontal force can be applied to a block against a vertical surface while keeping it stationary. Key points include the need to balance forces in both the x and y directions, particularly considering gravity, the applied force, and static friction. The equations derived involve resolving the applied force into its components and relating them to the normal force and static friction. Calculus is suggested as a method to find the maximum and minimum angles. The exchange concludes with the user expressing gratitude for the clarification that helped overcome their confusion.
pirland
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Ok, I've been having some real trouble with this problem. Either I’m missing some key piece of reasoning or it’s harder then it seems.

If a block of mass m is pressed against a vertical surface by a constant force Fh, what are the maximum and minimum angels that that force can be applied and still have the block remain stationary? Express in terms of m, g, theta, and mu.”

Now I assume that what is needed is to equate the maximum static friction force to the total force applied parallel to the surface, but I’m having trouble finding an equation that will give me my answer. Any tips or pointers would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a free-body diagram for the block.

You have two components of force going down, gravity and the y component of the applied force. Gravity is given by mg and, supposing theta is the angle of elevation, the y-component of the applied force is F\sin{\theta}. The normal force is the only force going up, and is opposite and equal to the sum of the downward forces, since there cannot be any net y-component of force.

You have one force in each horizontal direction. On one side you have the x-component of applied force, F\cos{\theta}. On the other side you have the force of static friction, F_n \mu, where F_n is the normal force. Again, these two forces must balance.

Can you take it from there?

--J
 
Clarification

Sorry, I should have specified more, the problem that I'm having is with the resolving of the actual equation. Since the block has not passed through the wall the horizontal force is being countered by the normal force, causing balance in the x axis. What I believe I'm looking for is a way to solve for theta in a situation where the static force is exactly equal to the sum of all forces in the y axis. When I put that together mathmatically I get something along the lines of:

-cos(theta)Fh*mu=sin(theta)Fh+Fg

But I can't seem to resolve it into anything useful, mainly the maximum and minimum values of theta. If the above equation is in fact correct could you point me in the righ direction for solving it?
 
Oh, I totally misread the question. Sorry about that.

In the x-direction, there's the applied force and the normal force.

0 = F_h \cos{\theta} + F_N = 0

Note that the normal force will be negative, as it's pointing in the opposite direction.

In the y-direction, there's the applied force, gravity, and the static friction force.

0 = F_h \sin{\theta} + F_g + F_s

F_g, as I'm sure you know, is mg. F_s = F_N \mu, so you must solve the first equation for F_N and substitute it in there. This gives you an equation you can work with, as it has only one nonconstant, i.e. \theta.

In order to find the maximum and minimum values, you must use calculus.

--J
 
Sorry to be so long in responding, I got a nasty flu bug. The above information was just what I needed to break through my mental block, thanks for your prompt and informative response.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top