Minimum angle of resolution - units clarification

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the angle subtended by two stones from a mouse's perspective and determining the minimum angle of resolution (MAR) for its eye. The angle subtended by the stones was calculated to be 1.5 x 10^-3, with clarification needed on whether this value is in radians or degrees. It was confirmed that angles are measured in radians, as they are dimensionless ratios, and the calculations should reflect this. The MAR was calculated as 2.44 x 10^-4 radians using the appropriate formula. The importance of using the correct calculator mode to avoid confusion between degrees and radians was emphasized.
Elemental_
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mouse has an pupil diameter of 2.5 mm. lying 200 meters from the mouse are two stones 30 cm apart. λ = 500 nm
a) what angle do the stones subtend?
b) what is the MAR (minimum angle of resolution) of the mouse's eye.

Homework Equations


question a) tanθ = O/A
O= 0.3 m
A= 200 m

b) θmin = (1.22*λ )/d
d = pupil diameter

The Attempt at a Solution



for a) I calculated the answer to be 1.5 x 10^-3 however I'm not sure whether the unit for this would be in rads or degrees as the question asks for the angle? I'm aware that MAR (theta-min), the angle between two point sources needed in order for them to be resolved as separate is measured in radians - does this hold true for the angle that the stones subtend as well?

If the answer i calculated is indeed in the unit of degrees, would i have to convert it to rads? (which would be equivalent to 5.23 x 10^-3 rads)?

b) Minimum angular resolution i calculated to be 2.44 x 10^-4 rads using the formula 1.22(λ)/(diameter of pupil) - I'm pretty sure that this is measured in radians.

If anyone could help me in this it would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, Elemental_

Yeah, angles are measured in radians. Note, however, that the radian is a *dimensionless* unit. In other words, angles are dimensionless because they are defined as a ratio of two lengths (in the radian system). In part (a), you calculated the angle by dividing a length by a length. The units (metres) canceled out, leaving you with a dimensionless number. We just assign units to this dimensionless number called radians to indicate that it happens to be an angle.

The only way that the answer you calculated in part (a) could be in degrees would be if you used the wrong mode on your calculator when calculating the arctangent. Be careful to always use angles in radians in your calculations. The formulae you are using rely upon the angles being in radians...those formulae aren't even valid if the angles are not in radians (because they rely upon the definition of an angle as given in the radian system).
 
Thank you so much for the thorough explanation cepheid; I verified this by using the degree mode on my calculator instead, and as you said, the answer for a) was a completely different value (although converting this to rads afterwards using pi/180 is a viable option as well, but in my opinion it's not worth it for the extra step). Thanks again for the help!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top