Minimum consumption rate of a heat pump

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the efficiency of a heat pump, initially calculated as 30 using the formula η = T_h / (T_h - T_c). It is noted that this formula may lead to inaccuracies, particularly with larger temperature differences. The conversation highlights the distinction between efficiency and the coefficient of performance (COP), with the latter being a more appropriate measure for heat pumps. The textbook's definition of efficiency is critiqued for being misleading, as it can exceed unity, which is not typical for efficiency metrics. Overall, the minimum consumption rate for the heat pump is debated, emphasizing the importance of using the correct definitions and formulas.
Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


upload_2017-12-26_17-1-11.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Effiency of a heat pump is given as ## \eta = \frac { T_h }{T_h – T_c} = 30 ##

W * 30/s = 6000*4.2 cal /s

Minimum consumption rate = W/s = 840 watt

Is this correct?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-26_17-1-11.png
    upload_2017-12-26_17-1-11.png
    20.3 KB · Views: 780
Physics news on Phys.org
Pushoam said:

Homework Statement


Effiency of a heat pump is given as ## \eta = \frac { T_h }{T_h – T_c} = 30 ##
This formula is not quite correct. It results in only about a 3% error in this case but it could be a lot more if Th - Tc were a lot larger.

So actually none of the choices is particularly good. But maybe you picked the closest ...
 
rude man said:
This formula is not quite correct.

The question is asking for minimum consumption rate.
For this I have to use a heat pump with carnot engine.
For this case, isn't the followiing right ?
Pushoam said:
Effiency of a heat pump is given as ##\eta = \frac { T_h }{T_h – T_c} = 30##

The textbook by blundell and blundell says,
upload_2017-12-27_12-16-26.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-27_12-16-26.png
    upload_2017-12-27_12-16-26.png
    21.1 KB · Views: 269
OK I see the problem I think.
Your textbook defines efficiency as e = Qh/W = (Qc + W)/W for some reason.
But most textbooks talk about the "coefficient of performance" (COP) which is much more logical since this is heat removed per unit of work.
So per your textbook e = 30 but for the COP it's 29.
The word "efficiency" really doesn't apply here IMO since by definition efficiency can never exceed unity.
 
Last edited:
What is meant by IMO?
 
Pushoam said:
What is meant by IMO?
" In My Opinion".
Many such abbreviations were started with texting. This one is extremely widely used.
 
  • Like
Likes Pushoam
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top