Minimum engagement length of a bolt

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on determining the minimum engagement length for an M10x1 bolt. Participants reference an article that provides formulas for calculating this length, particularly for metric bolts. There is a query about whether to use pitch in inches or Imperial units for the calculations. The consensus suggests using all Imperial units for safety, then converting the final measurement back to metric. Understanding the derivation of the formula is emphasized as important for accurate application.
siddharth23
Messages
249
Reaction score
26
Hey guys.
Could anyone give me an what the criteria for minimum engagement length of a bolt is?
The bolt I'm using is M10x1.

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
SteamKing said:
This article includes some formulas to calculate the minimum engagement length of a bolt (esp. metric bolts):

http://www.engineersedge.com/thread_strength/thread_minimum_length_engagement_fed-std-h28.htm

There is more information available if you Google the phrase 'minimum engagement length of bolt'.
Thanks! I read this one
Only thing is, do I just take the pitch in per inch or do I use Imperial units for the entire formula?
 
siddharth23 said:
Thanks! I read this one
Only thing is, do I just take the pitch in per inch or do I use Imperial units for the entire formula?

Without knowing more about the derivation of this formula, the safest approach would be to use all Imperial units and then convert the resulting length back into mm or cm.
 
SteamKing said:
Without knowing more about the derivation of this formula, the safest approach would be to use all Imperial units and then convert the resulting length back into mm or cm.
Ok mate! Thanks a lot :smile:
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...