Minimum Work Physics Problem | 65 kg Student Climbs 8.0 m Stairway in 12 s

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the minimum work done by a 65 kg student climbing an 8.0 m stairway, the relevant formula is work equals force times distance (w = fd). The force required is greater than the weight of the student, calculated as 65 kg multiplied by 9.8 m/s², resulting in approximately 5096 N. The total work done is then found by multiplying this force by the height of the stairway, yielding a minimum work of about 5100 J. The time taken to climb the stairs does not affect the calculation of work in this context. Understanding the relationship between force, distance, and work is crucial for solving such physics problems.
brentwoodbc
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the minimum work done when a 65 kg student climbs an 8.0 m-high stairway in 12 s?




The Attempt at a Solution


v=d/t
v=8/12
v=2/3

v = v2+v1 over 2
2/3 = v2+0 over 2
v2 = 2x[2/3]
v2=4/3

w=deltaEk
w=.5x65x[4/3]^2 - .5x65x0
w = 57 j ?

answer is 5100 j
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hint :work is force times distance. So the time taken does not matter at all.
 


Edit I get it, trick question lol.
thank you.
 


brentwoodbc said:
I know
w=fd
f=ma
f=65x9.8
f=5096

but that doesn't have time or distance.

It seems you got the answer!
The minimum work needed would be done by a force acting upward, in the opposite direction of the weight. Its magnitude would have to be greater than the weight, so >65 kg*9.8m/s^2 as you did.
You wrote w=fd, where w is the work, f is the force and d is the distance. Then you said that the formula doesn't have a distance?
Well you've done it :)
 


fluidistic said:
It seems you got the answer!
The minimum work needed would be done by a force acting upward, in the opposite direction of the weight. Its magnitude would have to be greater than the weight, so >65 kg*9.8m/s^2 as you did.
You wrote w=fd, where w is the work, f is the force and d is the distance. Then you said that the formula doesn't have a distance?
Well you've done it :)

haha, i know what I typed wasnt actually what I did.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top