Minkowski diagram - the angle between axes

3nTr0pY
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I was reading through my textbook and it said that the angle between the axes of two inertial frames, one stationary and one moving at velocity v is supposed to be tan^-1(v/c). I assumed this would be easy to show, but after spending a couple of hours on this probably trivial problem, I can't for the life of me get the right answer.

I'm using the transformation:

ct' = ctcosh(a) -xsinh(a)
x' = -ctsinh(a) + xcosh(a)
y' = y
z' = z

where a is the 'rapidity function', tanh^-1(v/c) (not that I really understand what that is)

What I've done is choose a value of ct' and kept x' = 0 i.e. (0, ct'), because I'm supposed to be looking at the axes. I'm supposed to convert this into the other inertial frame, I think, but I'm really confused...

Anyone know the answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I solved it using bog standard Lorentz transformations. As (annoyingly) easy as that.But I'm still really confused as to why I couldn't get the transformation I mentioned in my first post to work (the Lorentz boost). I don't really get how it works/what the point of it is, so any clarification on that would be helpful.
 
The x' axis is where t'=0. So set t'=0 and solve for the slope of this line, ct/x, and I think you'll get the answer you're looking for.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top