Mixing of fluid streams in rivers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Studiot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluid Mixing
AI Thread Summary
A local amenity area features a side stream that is visually distinct from a nearby river, with the river exhibiting a reddish-brown color and the side stream appearing grey-green. The two bodies of water do not mix, creating a clear boundary. This phenomenon is observed at various confluences, such as the Monongahela and Allegheny rivers in Pittsburgh. Discussions highlight the apparent cessation of flow in the side stream, although some argue it is still flowing, with the interface creating an illusion of stillness. The river's rapid flow is confirmed by local gauging stations indicating levels above the weir, and the term "in spate" is noted as a descriptor for the river's condition during flooding events.
Studiot
Messages
5,440
Reaction score
10
Walking round a local amenity area today brought this photo of a side stream cut off by the local river in spate flowing past from left to right in the picture.

The river water is reddy brown and the side stream grey-green.
The two waters are not mixing as can be seen by the well defined boundary.
 

Attachments

  • flood1.jpg
    flood1.jpg
    84.5 KB · Views: 682
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
This happens at many confluences, the most recent I've personally seen is at the confluence of the Monongahela and Allegheny rivers in Pittsburgh, PA. It's pretty neat to see.
 
What would you have expected it to look like?

The grey green needs to somehow transition to the reddish brown?

Maybe I don't get your question.
 
Maybe I don't get your question.

Obviously not since I didn't have one.

I just thought that some might be interested.

I can certainly see some features of hydraulics theory in play can you?

The most obvious is that the side stream flow has essentially ceased.
 
Studiot said:
Obviously not since I didn't have one.

I just thought that some might be interested.

Ah! Ok. My bad. Sorry.

The most obvious is that the side stream flow has essentially ceased.

No I don't think that's true. I think it is still flowing. The interface makes you think it isn't.
 
It is difficult to impossible to show true (as opposed to arty) movement in a still photo.

I can assure you that the water in the side stream was essentially still. Normally its level would not be that high and it would run out quite quickly into the river.
 
Studiot said:
It is difficult to impossible to show true (as opposed to arty) movement in a still photo.

I can assure you that the water in the side stream was essentially still. Normally its level would not be that high and it would run out quite quickly into the river.

The main stream was flowing very fast?
 
The main stream was flowing very fast?

That's what I said. The nearby river gauging station was running above the weir.

the local river in spate

Perhaps this English term is new to you?

Here are some typical flood pictures from November.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
49K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top