Modelling simulation for 6g shock

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing a camera fixture that can withstand 6 g's of shock during transportation. The student seeks advice on effective modeling techniques, questioning whether to model the shock as acceleration or force. They consider using ADAMS software for simulation but are unsure about the necessary inputs to replicate the 6 g shock. A simple model suggests that the fixture can be dropped from a calculated height to determine its resilience, but acknowledges that real-world conditions may exceed theoretical limits. Additionally, a more advanced model should analyze the fixture's frequency response to avoid resonance issues that could compromise its integrity.
siddy88
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am a student designing a camera fixture for my senior design project. We are halfway through our project right now and we are trying to do some validation stuff for our fixture.

One of the requirements for our fixture is for it to withstand 6 g's of shock during shipping/transportation etc. the whole fixture sits on one large base plate and most of the shock on the system can be modeled as though it is acting directly on this base plate. I have a few questions regarding this.

a) Any suggestions on what might be the most effective way to do this?

b) 6 gees is acceleration but obviously I can model it as a force as well. Any advice on what is better

c) I was thinking of using ADAMS software to model the shock but have no clue what I would input to mimic the 6 gees of shock.

Any advice on this would be helpful. Thank you

Of course we could just do it once our prototype is ready however this might not be the best idea because if it does not withstand that force then our model will just collapse and that will be bad.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Assuming that the fixture is padded for transport with material that can compress during impact with even force over the distance d and the fixture can sustain k gees, then the padded fixture can be dropped into free fall onto a hard surface from the height h = (k-1)*d. If dropped from above that height the average (and therefore also peak) acceleration during impact will be above k gees. This is of course a very simple model that only gives the "optimal" relationship between h and d, so in practice you will find peak acceleration going above k gees at drop heights below h.

The above model is a simple DC model. A somewhat better model would require that you know or analyze the "frequency response" of your fixture to see if may accept higher gees in higher frequencies. Also, if there is a "resonance" at a fairly low frequency you may want to use a padding that moves this resonance to a "safer" frequency or spread it out a bit.

(Disclaimer: above comments are made from the points of control engineering. I have no special theoretical or practical experience with constructing such transportation paddings).
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top