Modern Physics: Center of Momentum Speed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grieverheart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Center Inertia
Grieverheart
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Center of momentum?

Hi there,i'm giving exams this tuesday on modern physics and I stumpled upon a problem which i couldn't find an answer in my book and internet.The problem in a few words asks you to find the speed of the center of momentum when 2 particles collide.Can someone please give a definition of the "center of momentum speed" and formulas or links please?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Grieverheart said:
Hi there,i'm giving exams this tuesday on modern physics and I stumpled upon a problem which i couldn't find an answer in my book and internet.The problem in a few words asks you to find the speed of the center of momentum when 2 particles collide.Can someone please give a definition of the "center of momentum speed" and formulas or links please?

I don't know what is "center of momentum". They probably had in mind "center of mass" \mathbf{R}. In relativistic quantum mechanics it is also known as the Newton-Wigner position operator. For a classical system of non-interacting particles with positions \mathbf{r}_i and energies e_i the definition is

\mathbf{R} = E^{-1} \sum_i e_i \mathbf{r}_i.....(1)

where

E= \sum_i e_i

is the total energy of the system. In the non-relativistic case, when the rest energy dominates, one gets E \approx Mc^2, e_i \approx m_ic^2, and

\mathbf{R} = M^{-1} \sum_i m_i \mathbf{r}_i

the familiar definition of the "center of mass".

The center of mass of any isolated system always moves along straight line with constant velocity. This is true also for interacting systems of particles, whose center-of-mass is given by formulas more complicated than (1).

Eugene.
 
Here is a geometric interpretation.

Consider a system of particles. Add up their 4-momenta [using either the parallelogram rule or the tail-to-tip method] and obtain the resultant 4-momentum vector. The center of momentum is the reference frame with unit vector tangent to that resultant 4-vector.

In the current frame, this vector has components of the form
E \hat t + P \hat s = M(\cosh\theta \hat t + \sinh\theta \hat s)=M\cosh\theta(\hat t+\tanh\theta \hat s) = M\cosh\theta(\hat t+V \hat s),
where V\hat s is the velocity of that center-of-momentum-frame.
Writing
E \hat t + P \hat s = E (\hat t +\frac{P}{E}\hat s),
we can express that velocity as the ratio of relativistic-spatial-momentum to relativistic-energy: V=\frac{P}{E}.

In that center of momentum frame, the relativistic-spatial-momentum P' in that frame is zero.

In short, the center-of-momentum-frame is along the resultant,
and the velocity of that frame [with respect to our frame] is "the slope of the resultant" in our coordinates.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top