Modern Physics - velocity of electron accelerated through 6 Mev

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of an electron accelerated through 6 MeV, highlighting the confusion around mass and speed in relativistic physics. It emphasizes that, unlike Newtonian physics where mass is constant, relativistic physics shows that mass increases with speed, particularly as velocities approach a significant fraction of the speed of light. Participants clarify that traditional kinetic energy calculations become inadequate at high speeds, necessitating the use of relativistic equations. The conversation also touches on the historical context of these concepts, noting that understanding took time even after Einstein's explanations. Overall, the thread underscores the importance of applying relativistic principles when dealing with high-energy particles.
shivam01anand
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Modern Physics -- velocity of electron accelerated through 6 Mev

Homework Statement



Electron accelerated through 6 Mev. from rest. My Answer was > speed of light

Homework Equations

Then our professor told us to not conserve KE only as mass was increased. Therefore use einstein's e=mc^2.

The Attempt at a Solution



he gave us the formulas of new mass vs old mass at rest.

I just don't get it why is mass increased as well as speed increased even though we're starting from rest
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi shivam01anand! welcome to pf! :smile:
shivam01anand said:
I just don't get it why is mass increased as well as speed increased even though we're starting from rest

mass is energy, energy is mass

in Newtonian physics, mass is constant, so (even though it's energy), we can ignore it in the conservation-of-energy equation!

in relativistic physics, mass is not constant, so the conservation-of-energy equation must include mass-after minus mass-before :wink:
 
Wait, How come if this same question came when i studied electric field and applied the wrong method[ i.e energy conservation] it would have been correct?
 
shivam01anand said:
Wait, How come if this same question came when i studied electric field and applied the wrong method[ i.e energy conservation] it would have been correct?

Because when you "studied electric field" you neglected relativistic effects.

Relativistic effects can be ignored for v< ~ 0.1c. If your computations using kinetic and potential energies indicate a velocity greater than about 0.1c then you must redo your computations using relativistic equations.
 
yes, for ordinary speeds, the error is less than 1 in 1012, way too small to take any notice of! :smile:
 
shivam01anand said:
I just don't get it why is mass increased as well as speed increased even though we're starting from rest
Just to anticipate a possible misunderstanding...
In relativity, what you used to think of as KE is the gain in mass. So don't go calculating a gain in KE (by Newton) and a gain in mass (by Einstein) and adding them together.
 
shivam01anand said:
I just don't get it why is mass increased as well as speed increased even though we're starting from rest


Don't feel bad. No one else 'got it' either until Einstein explained it in 1905. Even then, it took a while before many physicists 'got it'! :smile:
 
The argument about the validity of the concept of relativistic mass has been deleted. It's clear from the opening post that the answer is expected to be given using the framework of relativistic mass, so if you don't like relativistic mass, use it anyway or keep your fingers away from your keyboard.

Arguments about relativistic mass go in the relativity forum in the main Physics section.
 
Last edited:
jtbell said:
if you don't like relativistic mass, use it anyway or keep your fingers away from your keyboard.

.



lol funny
 

Similar threads

Back
Top