Modulation in high frequencies and antennas

AI Thread Summary
Modulating signals at high frequencies is preferred because it allows the wavelength to be smaller than the antenna length, facilitating efficient radiation. Efficient antennas typically include half-wave dipoles or quarter-wave monopoles, which are designed to match the wavelength of the signal. While modulation itself is not directly related to antenna design, the choice of carrier frequency impacts antenna size and signal propagation. The primary considerations for frequency selection include wave propagation characteristics, such as the ability to travel over the horizon or reflect off the ionosphere. Ultimately, while antenna size can influence frequency choice, it is not the main factor driving modulation decisions.
dervast
Messages
132
Reaction score
1
Hi to everyone. I have heard that we usually prefer to modulate signals at high frequencies so the wave length is small compared to the length of the antenna. Is there any rule or equation that implies this requirement?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
To be an efficient radiator, an antenna will generally be a half-wave dipole or a quarter-wave monopole. That is, a dipole antenna will have two opposed elements, each a quarter-wavelength long. A monopole will have a single radiating element a quarter-wavelength long, over some ground plane or set of ground elements.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_(radio)
 
dervast said:
Hi to everyone. I have heard that we usually prefer to modulate signals at high frequencies so the wave length is small compared to the length of the antenna. Is there any rule or equation that implies this requirement?

Modulation has little to nothing to do with the antenna. The carrier frequency and the antenna are related as berkeman pointed out.
 
Averagesupernova said:
Modulation has little to nothing to do with the antenna. The carrier frequency and the antenna are related as berkeman pointed out.
I agree with u.. the antenna has nothing to do withthe modulation scheme. I was talking about modulation describing that we modulate signals in high frequencies
 
So you are saying that the reason we use certain frequencies in the spectrum for the carrier is to keep the antenna size in check? The main reason we use the ones we do is propagation of the wave. Some signals we want to go over the horizon, some we don't. Some signals we want refracted off the ionosphere, some we don't. However, there ARE cases were antenna size is a consideration. I would not say it is the main reason. Throwing the word modulation in there has thrown me off.
 
dervast said:
...wave length is small compared to the length of the antenna. Is there any rule or equation that implies this requirement?
As Berkeman has implied, the antenna length of efficient radiating elements is not larger than the wavelength of the transmitted signal.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top