Molar Enthalpy of Salt: Calculation and Heat Sources

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hannah Wallace
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Salt
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the molar enthalpy of different salts, specifically NH4Cl, KNO3, and LiCl, through heat measurements. The correct approach involves using the equation mcΔt, where the mass of both the water and the salt should be considered. It is clarified that terms like "heat" and "enthalpy" refer to properties of processes, not substances, and the correct terminology includes "heat of dissolution" and "enthalpy of dissolution." While using the specific heat capacity of water is generally acceptable for diluted solutions, it is noted that the specific heat capacity of the solution would be more precise. Accurate calculations are essential for understanding the thermal properties of these salts in solution.
Hannah Wallace
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Please post this type of questions in HW section using the template.
So for a lab I had to test three different salt Nh4Cl,KN03 and LiCl. I found the heat of each of them and then in turn found the molar enthalpy by using N*molar enthalpy=-heat. When finding my heat and using equation mcΔt would I use the mass of the water or the mass of the water and the salt?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note: things like "heat", "enthalpy" are properties of a process, not of a substance, so what you wrote doesn't make much sense. I guess what you mean is "heat of dissolution" and "enthalpy of dissolution" (AKA "heat/enthalpy of solution").

Mass of water and salt is a bit more correct, although technically you should also use specific heat capacity of the solution, not of the pure water. For diluted solutions using specific heat capacity of water is usually accurate enough.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top