Moment of inertia for rectangular plate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for a rectangular plate of dimensions a x b without using integrals. The user suggests using Steiner's theorem and considers the plate as composed of numerous parallel slices. Each slice is treated as a thin rod, and the moment of inertia for each rod is calculated, leading to a total moment of inertia for the plate along both the x and y axes. The final moment of inertia along the z-axis is derived as Iz = m(a^2 + b^2)/12. A correction is noted regarding the application of Steiner's theorem, emphasizing the need to account for the distance from the axis for each slice.
siestrand
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I've got a problem with this:
Count moment of inertia for rectangular plate a x b, if you know that moment of inertia of thin rod is \frac{1}{12}ml^2. Do not use integrals!, others mathematical functions required (I can proof this moment by integrals, but this is not issue). I know that I have to use Steiner theory, but how? No integrals? :(
Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the plate as made of several parallel slices.
 
Ok, I know that, but the problem is: how can I count it without integrals? I must sum up all the slices' distance from axis, but how am I supposed to do it without integrals?
 
let us consider a rectangular plate to be a x b dimensions of total mass m

let x-axis be along the length direction and y be along width direction and origin be at the center of plate.
consider it to have 'n' parallel slices (n being very large number) along x direction so that each slice a like a rod of mass m/n and length 'a'
Moment of inertia of each rod along x axis, I = m(a^2)/(12n)
Moment of inertia of plate along x aixs =Ix = n I = m(a^2)/(12)
( this is because u have n slices)
similary if u repeat above exercise along y direction
Moment of inertia of plate along y aixs = Iy = m(b^2)/(12)

Moment of inertia of plate along z aixs = Iz = Ix + Iy
= m(a^2)/(12) + m(b^2)/(12)
= m( a^2 + b^2)/12

note : we haven't used any integrals..its just addition
 
Last edited:
There is one mistake, I think.
One slice has of course I = m(a^2)/(12n) but not by this axis! the axis is in the centre of plate and every slice has I = m(a^2)/(12n) + \frac{m}{n} * r^2 from Steiner theory when r ist distance from axis.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top