Moment of inertia of a polygon

cigarette
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
How can one calculate the moment of inertia of a polygon?
Assuming that one knows the polygon’s total area, centroid
and vertices, which are connected by straight lines in a 2D system.
Is it possible to avoid a difficult integral over the area/mass?

Any helpful information is highly appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is it a regular polygon? You could break it into triangles each with a vertex at the center of the polygon and add up the moments of inertia appropriately.
 
Tide said:
Is it a regular polygon? You could break it into triangles each with a vertex at the center of the polygon and add up the moments of inertia appropriately.


hi tide, in response to ur question, it is an arbitrarily shaped polygon, which basically means any shape with any number of vertices..maybe can call it "n"-agon.

i get the triangular part, but just wondering whether there is any other mathematical methods.

regards
 
I have calculated the moment of inertia about the origin of a polygon based on its vertices.

The equation is

1/12 * sum { (y_{i+1} - y_{i} )(x_{i+1} + x_{i})(x_{i+1}^2 + x_{i}^2)
- (x_{i+1} - x_{i} )(y_{i+1} + y_{i})(y_{i+1}^2 + y_{i}^2)

I put the details of its derivation on my web page.

http://www.enel.ucalgary.ca/~shannon/v2/green/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top