Moments Question: Plotting Distance Moved vs Resultant of A

  • Thread starter Thread starter Energize
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moments
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the resultant force at pivot A of a beam with an elephant's weight acting on it. Participants clarify that the elephant's position affects the resultant force, especially when it is beyond 1.2 meters from pivot A, transitioning the problem from statics to kinetics. The importance of calculating moments around a fixed point, such as the left end of the beam, is emphasized to ensure the sum of moments and forces equals zero. There is also a debate about the direction of forces at pivot B, with some suggesting it can exert a downward force. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of analyzing forces and moments in a dynamic system.
Energize
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Ok I have this question where there is a beam 12m long, there is a pivot 3m along the beam (A) and another 10m along the beam (B). There is an elephant at the left end of the beam that weighs 10,000N and the weight of the beam is 4000N, I need to plot a graph of the distance moved (m) against the resultant of A. Now I know how to get the resultant of A when the object is in between the 2 pivots, but how do I work out the resultant of A when the object is not in between the 2 pivots?
 

Attachments

  • diagram1.JPG
    diagram1.JPG
    7.7 KB · Views: 461
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly do you mean by 'resultant of A'?
 
The force upwards against the beam at that pivot.
 
Energize said:
The force upwards against the beam at that pivot.

If I made a correct sketch, the sum of moments around B should give: 4*4000 - 7*A + (10-x)*10000 = 0, so you can get the function A(x) from the equation.
 
Energize said:
Ok I have this question where there is a beam 12m long, there is a pivot 3m along the beam (A) and another 10m along the beam (B). There is an elephant at the left end of the beam that weighs 10,000N and the weight of the beam is 4000N, I need to plot a graph of the distance moved (m) against the resultant of A. Now I know how to get the resultant of A when the object is in between the 2 pivots, but how do I work out the resultant of A when the object is not in between the 2 pivots?
There are lots of ways to approach this, but one avoids some sign difficulties you may be having. If you calculate torque about the left end of the beam, the elephant's moment arm goes from 0 to12m with no sign changes, If you assume forces are up at A and B, then a negative force will indicate that the force is actually down. You really don't have to think about the elephant being between the supports or not. The elephant is always to the right of the left end.
 
OlderDan said:
There are lots of ways to approach this, but one avoids some sign difficulties you may be having. If you calculate torque about the left end of the beam, the elephant's moment arm goes from 0 to12m with no sign changes, If you assume forces are up at A and B, then a negative force will indicate that the force is actually down. You really don't have to think about the elephant being between the supports or not. The elephant is always to the right of the left end.

Sorry I don't understand. I need to move the elephant along the beam 1m at a time and calculate the resultant of A each time for my graph.
 
Last edited:
I can tell you this much. This is not a statics problem until the elephant is only 1.2 m left of A. When it is more than 1.2 m left of A, it becomes a kinetics problem.
 
I'm still confused as to how I have to work this out.
 
civil_dude said:
I can tell you this much. This is not a statics problem until the elephant is only 1.2 m left of A. When it is more than 1.2 m left of A, it becomes a kinetics problem.
I can see why you say that, but you are assuming RB has to be upward. There was no visible diagram when I replied, so I did not make that assumption. Thers is no reason why the support at B cannot apply a downward force. The problem says these points are pivots, implying that the beam could only rotate about these points. Since there are two such points, no rotation is possible.
 
  • #10
Energize said:
I'm still confused as to how I have to work this out.
Now that your diagram is visible, it will be easy to follow your attempt at writing and solving the equations. Do what you can and post it.

Pick one point (I suggest the left end of the plank) and calculate all the moments assuming the elephant is a distance m from the left side. The sum of the moments must be zero. The sum of the forces acting (positve up and negative down) must be zero.
 
  • #11
OlderDan said:
I can see why you say that, but you are assuming RB has to be upward. There was no visible diagram when I replied, so I did not make that assumption. Thers is no reason why the support at B cannot apply a downward force. The problem says these points are pivots, implying that the beam could only rotate about these points. Since there are two such points, no rotation is possible.

Dan you are correct, I did make the assumption that B could not supply a downward reaction.

Thanks for catching that.
 
  • #12
civil_dude said:
Dan you are correct, I did make the assumption that B could not supply a downward reaction.

Thanks for catching that.
The elephant is the one who should be thankful for the catch :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top