What defines an isolated system and the role of external forces in momentum?

AI Thread Summary
An isolated system is defined as one where no external forces act upon it, allowing for constant momentum. In the case of two stacked boxes pushed across a table, the system may not be truly isolated if external forces like friction from the table are considered. The distinction between "constant speed" and "constant velocity" is important, as the latter implies direction, which affects momentum. Clarification is needed on what constitutes an isolated system, as even systems that are not completely isolated can maintain constant momentum if forces are balanced. Understanding the nuances of Newton's laws is crucial, particularly in differentiating between the types of forces involved.
qwertymeister42
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
This is with regard to 2 boxes of different masses that are stacked on top of each other and pushed at a constant velocity across a table that has friction. One of the sentences is right:

"When the boxes move at a constant speed, there is no change in momentum. This means that the boxes are an isolated system."

My initial thought was that the mistake was in saying "constant speed" when it should be "constant velocity". But is there a problem in how the system is defined as only the two boxes? Should it include the table, for example?

EDIT: Also, could someone clear up exactly what the threshold for "isolated" is? This always confused me because nothing is isolated unless the system is literally everything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any system can continue to have the same momentum under two conditions:
1. System is isolated meaning nothing can act on it from its outside no connection no interaction.
2. System is not really isolated but the forces acting on them as a whole or on its parts are balanced to give net zero force.
System does not include table but table and pushing agency interact with the blocks and also also blocks interact with each other through the touching surfaces.
 
  • Like
Likes qwertymeister42
Also I would like to add although Newton's laws define force the force that is talked about in first two laws is different from the force that is spelled as action reaction in the third law!
 
  • Like
Likes qwertymeister42
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
53
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
12K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
10K
Back
Top