Momentum Conservation and Center of Mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of the center of mass for a system of three balls with differing masses and applied forces. The initial calculation incorrectly averages the individual accelerations instead of using the net force divided by the total mass. It is clarified that the momentum of a block under a net force will increase, while the total mechanical energy remains conserved in the absence of non-conservative forces. The importance of correctly applying the definitions of acceleration and mechanical energy is emphasized. Overall, the calculations and concepts need refinement for accuracy.
TwinGemini14
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
1. Ball 1, ball 2, and ball 3 have masses 1 kg, 2 kg, and 3 kg respectively, and are initially arranged at x = 5 m, x = 10 m, and x = 15 m respectively (see picture). y = 5 m for all three balls. Now suppose that a net force of 1 N is applied to ball 1 in the +y direction and a net force of 2 N is applied to ball 2 in the -y direction. The net force on ball 3 is zero.


What is the magnitude of the acceleration of the center of mass of the three-ball system?

A) 0.00 m/s2
B) 0.17 m/s2
C) 0.33 m/s2
D) 1.00 m/s2
E) 1.33 m/s2

----

So I first drew out the picture of the masses. Then since the acceleration of the center of mass is just the weighted average acceleration of all the masses, I did...
F1 = m1a1 or 1 = 1(a1) so a1=1.
F2 = m2a2 or 2 = 2(a2) so a2=1.
F3 = m3a3 or 0 = 3(a3) so a3=0.

(a1+a2+a3)/(m1+m2+m3) = 0.333m/s^2. So the answer is C. Is this correct?

============
A block of mass 50 kg is sliding along in the +x direction (to the right) with initial magnitude of momentum p0 = 2450 kg*m/s on a horizontal frictionless surface.


Then a constant force F = 14 N is applied as shown in the above drawing, where the angle of the force above horizontal is 20°.

2) One second after the force is applied, the momentum of the block in the ground frame will have:

A) decreased in magnitude
B) been conserved
C) increased in magnitude

----
The momentum has increased in magnitude since the object is accelerating due to a net force, correct? C?
----
3) After the force is applied, the total mechanical energy of the block will:

A) be less than it was before the force was applied
B) remain the same as it was before the force was applied
C) be greater than it was before the force was applied

----
B. Since the total mechanical energy is always conserved in this situation, right?
----

Can somebody please look over my work to see if I did these right? I really appreciate it. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TwinGemini14 said:
(a1+a2+a3)/(m1+m2+m3) = 0.333m/s^2. So the answer is C. Is this correct?

No. Why do you think the sum of the accelerations divided by total mass is somehow still an acceleration? Units are wrong at a minimum.

Also too your forces are in different directions. Maybe if you considered the Net force divided by total mass you would have a better handle on how the CoM is being accelerated?
 
For 2) assuming your force is directed horizontally in the direction of movement already, then yes momentum would increase with velocity.

For the next part, what is the definition of mechanical energy?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top