Momentum eigenvalues and eigenfunctions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the wave functions ψ_{x}, ψ_{y}, and ψ_{z} are eigenfunctions of the angular momentum operators Lx, Ly, and Lz, respectively, along with L^2. The user attempts to calculate Lz|ψ_{z}> and shows that it leads to the expected eigenvalue equation. They express concern about the explicit calculation of partial derivatives and whether their approach is correct. The calculations involve applying the angular momentum operators to the wave functions and confirming that the results align with the eigenvalue definitions. The user seeks clarification on their method and any potential oversights.
White_M
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For the following wave functions:
ψ_{x}=xf(r)
ψ_{y}=yf(f)
ψ_{z}=zf(f)

show, by explicit calculation, that they are eigenfunctions of Lx,Ly,Lz respectively, as well as of L^2, and find their corresponding eigenvalues.

Homework Equations



I used:
L_{x}=-ih(y\partial/\partial z-z\partial/\partial y)
L_{y}=-ih(z\partial/\partial x-x\partial/\partial z)
L_{z}=-ih(x\partial/\partial y-y\partial/\partial x)

for solving:

L_{z}|ψ_{z}>=lz|ψ_{z}>
L_{x}|ψ_{x}>=lx|ψ_{x}>
L_{y}|ψ_{y}>=ly|ψ_{y}>


and
L^2|ψ>=l^2|ψ>

where:
L^2=L_{x}^2+L_{y}^2+L_{z}^2

The Attempt at a Solution



For instance for Lz:
ψ_{z}(r)=<r|z>=zf(r)

L_{z}|ψ_{z}>=-ih(x\partial/\partial y-y\partial/\partial x) zf(r)=lz|ψ_{z}>

Is that correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think they want you to "explicitly" take partial derivatives of the function z f(r) .
 
-ih (x(\partialz\\partialy f(r)+z \partialf(r)/\partialy)-y(\partialz\\partialx+z\partialf(r)\\partialx))=-ih (xz\partialf(r)\\partialy-yz \partialf(r)\\partialx)=-ih (x\partial\\partialy-y\partial\\partialx)zf(r)

Which is the same as the initial expression.

What am I missing?

Thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top