Money per person and 2nd generation

caters
Messages
229
Reaction score
10
In my base 10 math world there are rules for the gender of 1st generation numbers. They are:

Primes alternate between 1 gender and another(specifically M and F)

Composites have 3 more rules related to number of factors:
M factors > F factors = M
M factors < F factors = F
M factors = F factors = H(hermaphrodite)

Now there are even more rules for reproduction(hermaphrodites are bifertile in Math World meaning that they produce both eggs and sperm). They are:

Male mates with Female
Female mates with Male(classic reproduction rules)

AND

Hermaphrodite mates with Female
Hermaphrodite mates with Male
Hermaphrodite mates with Hermaphrodite(resulting in 2 pregnancies)
Hermaphrodite mates with Self

All of this is because of 4 sex chromosomes like this:
XXXX: Female
XXXY: Male
XXYY: Hermaphrodite
XYYY: Male

0,2,5,10,11,17,20,22,23,31,34,40,41,42,43,46,47,50 ,55,59,61,62,68,71,79,80,82,85,88,89,92,94,and 100 are male

4,8,16,32,64,and 25 are hermaphroditic

the rest of the 101 numbers are female.

Given these reproduction rules and that every number gets x chances of reproduction and these operations:
+
-
*
/
^
nth root
and
tetration
how many 2nd generation numbers are there including repeats assuming that every time a number mates that it is either with a different number or with the same number but a different operational chromosome expressed?

Also the mother is one of the addends for +, the minuend for -, one of the factors(specifically the multiplicand which is what you are multiplying) for *, the dividend for /, the base for ^, the index for nth root, and both the base and exponent for tetration. So this reduces the potential amount in half since it is always Female or Hermaphrodite (Operation) Male, Hermaphrodite, or Self.

Also, assuming everything is free until all the x+101 numbers get an equal amount of money and 1 person produces per year 13,146,337,252,759,428 dollars(5 of each denomination of the third Zimbabwe dollar * 73(which is 365/5)), and that 5 people are producing money how many years will it take to get an equal amount of money to everyone? How much money will each number have after those y years?

Just to clarify the Third Zimbabwe Dollar denominations from 1 up are:

1 dollar
5 dollars
10 dollars
20 dollars
100 dollars
500 dollars
1000 dollars
10000 dollars
20000 dollars
50000 dollars
100000 dollars
500000 dollars
1 million dollars
10 million dollars
100 million dollars
200 million dollars
500 million dollars
1 billion dollars
5 billion dollars
10 billion dollars
20 billion dollars
50 billion dollars
10 trillion dollars
20 trillion dollars
50 trillion dollars
and
100 trillion dollars
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Does this have some specific background or is it just a random collection of weird rules?
 
As far as the gender of first generation numbers that is from number gender synesthesia.

For the chromosomes it is from my knowledge that XX is female and XY is male in most organisms and that hermaphrodites can be fertile.

For the mother being the first number in the equation that is because the mother is the most important relative.

The reproduction rules are from my knowledge of meiosis and fertilization.
 
It's your invention, why don't you investigate it and tell us about the results, if you think they are interesting? Along the way you might be able to remove what appear to be inconsistencies between the definitions of gender using prime factors (which is pretty clear) and using chromasomes (which seems less clear to me).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top